Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$13.33
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.92M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$11.52
Change-$0.14 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.48M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 93.9M vs. TRCLX (45.5M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (3.48) vs TRCLX (1.69). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.32 vs. TRCLX (7.90). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : 0.01 vs. MICDX (-2.71).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.680 | 9.091 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.9M | 45.5M | 206% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 1.69 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.32 | 7.90 | 283% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.77 | -0.80 | -473% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | 0.01 | -46,508% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement