Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.12
Change-$0.11 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.07
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets62.47M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICDX vs. TRCLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICDX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. TRCLX (62.5M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (2.93) vs TRCLX (1.36). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX (34.66) and MICDX (33.75) have marching annual gain over last year. MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -4.63 vs. TRCLX (-5.07).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.842 | 33.523 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 62.5M | 156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.36 | 216% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.75 | 34.66 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 25.24 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.63 | -5.07 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement