Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MICDX vs TRCLX
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts MICDX vs TRCLX
Matthews China Dividend Instl
Price$15.58
Change-$0.05 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$14.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.55M
MICDX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MICDX vs. TRCLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MICDX is a Buy and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICDX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. TRCLX (63.5M). MICDX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: MICDX (2.93) vs TRCLX (1.34). MICDX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: MICDX (15 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). TRCLX (2.10) is less costly to investors than MICDX (1.19). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.40 vs. MICDX (75.80). MICDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: MICDX (100000) vs TRCLX (500000). MICDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.98 vs. TRCLX (30.01). MICDX return over 5 years is better than : -1.71 vs. TRCLX (-6.40).
| MICDX | TRCLX | MICDX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.03 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 2.10 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.950 | 33.144 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 500000 | 20% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.3M | 63.5M | 156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 1.34 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.98 | 30.01 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.84 | 33.50 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.71 | -6.40 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement