MHUBF
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.02 (-2.90%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
62.25M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMCL
Price
$35.56
Change
-$1.30 (-3.53%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.6B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MHUBF vs OMCL

Header iconMHUBF vs OMCL Comparison
Open Charts MHUBF vs OMCLBanner chart's image
MINEHUB TECHNOLOGIES
Price$0.67
Change-$0.02 (-2.90%)
Volume$27.59K
Capitalization62.25M
Omnicell
Price$35.56
Change-$1.30 (-3.53%)
Volume$345.62K
Capitalization1.6B
MHUBF vs OMCL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MHUBF vs. OMCL commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHUBF is a Hold and OMCL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MHUBF: $0.67 vs. OMCL: $35.56)
Brand notoriety: MHUBF and OMCL are both not notable
MHUBF represents the Packaged Software, while OMCL is part of the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHUBF: 16% vs. OMCL: 81%
Market capitalization -- MHUBF: $62.25M vs. OMCL: $1.6B
MHUBF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $62.25M. OMCL’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $1.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $294.81B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $47.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.42B. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHUBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOMCL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MHUBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OMCL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MHUBF and OMCL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MHUBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMCL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MHUBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMCL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMCL is a better buy in the short-term than MHUBF.

Price Growth

MHUBF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.35% price change this week, while OMCL (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.04%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

OMCL is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.97% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMCL($1.6B) has a higher market cap than MHUBF($62.3M). MHUBF YTD gains are higher at: 219.856 vs. OMCL (-17.206). OMCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. MHUBF (-6.23M). OMCL has more cash in the bank: 412M vs. MHUBF (2.52M). MHUBF has less debt than OMCL: MHUBF (1.69M) vs OMCL (384M). OMCL has higher revenues than MHUBF: OMCL (1.15B) vs MHUBF (1.5M).
MHUBFOMCLMHUBF / OMCL
Capitalization62.3M1.6B4%
EBITDA-6.23M103M-6%
Gain YTD219.856-17.206-1,278%
P/E RatioN/A82.70-
Revenue1.5M1.15B0%
Total Cash2.52M412M1%
Total Debt1.69M384M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OMCL: Fundamental Ratings
OMCL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MHUBFOMCL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MHUBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMCL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SGBLY15.780.43
+2.80%
Standard Bank Group Ltd.
TRZBF1.51N/A
N/A
Transat A.T. Inc.
GSISF3.93N/A
N/A
Genesis Minerals Limited
BSFAF0.05N/A
N/A
BSF Enterprise Plc
KSKGF3.17-0.03
-0.94%
Kingsgate Consolidated Ltd.

MHUBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHUBF and PHUN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHUBF and PHUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHUBF
1D Price
Change %
MHUBF100%
-0.15%
PHUN - MHUBF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
INTZ - MHUBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.00%
OMCL - MHUBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
BKKT - MHUBF
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
KCRD - MHUBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OMCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMCL has been loosely correlated with HSTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OMCL jumps, then HSTM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMCL
1D Price
Change %
OMCL100%
-0.67%
HSTM - OMCL
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.46%
FFIV - OMCL
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
RIOT - OMCL
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
CLSK - OMCL
43%
Loosely correlated
-5.09%
COIN - OMCL
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.00%
More