Advertisement
MHUAF vs TLSI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHUAF is a Buy and TLSI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MHUAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLSI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MHUAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TLSI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MHUAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLSI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MHUAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TLSI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MHUAF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TLSI (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.04%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.44% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.76% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| MHUAF | TLSI | MHUAF / TLSI | |
| Capitalization | 9.55M | 252M | 4% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -33.72M | - |
| Gain YTD | 444.390 | -27.650 | -1,607% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.36 | 0.08 | 479% |
| Revenue | N/A | 40.2M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 22.7M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 34.1M | - |
| MHUAF | TLSI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 23 days ago 53% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
MHUAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHUAF and ELUT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHUAF and ELUT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHUAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHUAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ELUT - MHUAF | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.92% | ||
| NEO - MHUAF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| OWLT - MHUAF | 25% Poorly correlated | +6.45% | ||
| TLSI - MHUAF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
| SGHT - MHUAF | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
TLSI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TLSI and KIDS have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLSI and KIDS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TLSI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLSI | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| KIDS - TLSI | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
| SUVPF - TLSI | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PRCT - TLSI | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BFLY - TLSI | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.88% | ||
| MHUAF - TLSI | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||