MHSDF
Price
$3.25
Change
+$0.44 (+15.66%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
2.79B
UMGP
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MHSDF vs UMGP

Header iconMHSDF vs UMGP Comparison
Open Charts MHSDF vs UMGPBanner chart's image
Megacable Holdings SAB DE CV
Price$3.25
Change+$0.44 (+15.66%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.79B
Universal Media Group
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$3.13K
Capitalization1.96M
MHSDF vs UMGP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MHSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MHSDF vs. UMGP commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHSDF is a StrongBuy and UMGP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MHSDF: $3.25 vs. UMGP: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: MHSDF and UMGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Movies/Entertainment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHSDF: 9% vs. UMGP: 10%
Market capitalization -- MHSDF: $2.79B vs. UMGP: $1.96M
MHSDF [@Movies/Entertainment] is valued at $2.79B. UMGP’s [@Movies/Entertainment] market capitalization is $1.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry ranges from $514.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Movies/Entertainment] industry is $12.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUMGP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MHSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UMGP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHSDF is a better buy in the long-term than UMGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MHSDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMGP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MHSDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UMGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MHSDF is a better buy in the short-term than UMGP.

Price Growth

MHSDF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а +15.66% price change this week, while UMGP (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +3.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was -1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Movies/Entertainment (-1.77% weekly)

Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MHSDF($2.79B) has a higher market cap than UMGP($1.96M). UMGP YTD gains are higher at: 130.703 vs. MHSDF (93.452). UMGP has less debt than MHSDF: UMGP (9.99M) vs MHSDF (26.5B).
MHSDFUMGPMHSDF / UMGP
Capitalization2.79B1.96M142,129%
EBITDA15.7BN/A-
Gain YTD93.452130.70371%
P/E Ratio42.47N/A-
Revenue34.2BN/A-
Total Cash3.09BN/A-
Total Debt26.5B9.99M265,345%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MHSDF vs UMGP: Fundamental Ratings
MHSDF
UMGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
79100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
13100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MHSDF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UMGP (95). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UMGP’s over the last 12 months.

MHSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as UMGP (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to UMGP’s over the last 12 months.

MHSDF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as UMGP (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to UMGP’s over the last 12 months.

UMGP's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MHSDF (40). This means that UMGP’s stock grew similarly to MHSDF’s over the last 12 months.

MHSDF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for UMGP (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew significantly faster than UMGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MHSDFUMGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MHSDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UMGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TTI5.890.25
+4.43%
TETRA Technologies
MDU17.480.42
+2.46%
MDU Resources Group
KB80.84-0.27
-0.33%
KB Financial Group
NXL0.94-0.02
-2.33%
Nexalin Technology
POWW1.44-0.06
-4.00%
Outdoor Holding Company

MHSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHSDF and CJREF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHSDF and CJREF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHSDF
1D Price
Change %
MHSDF100%
N/A
CJREF - MHSDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCOIF - MHSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UMGP - MHSDF
9%
Poorly correlated
+33.38%
QYOUF - MHSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
THBRF - MHSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
More

UMGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UMGP and THBRF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UMGP and THBRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UMGP
1D Price
Change %
UMGP100%
+33.38%
THBRF - UMGP
9%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
MHSDF - UMGP
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETWF - UMGP
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VIVHY - UMGP
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
NENTF - UMGP
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More