MHSDF vs QYOUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHSDF is a Hold and QYOUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MHSDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQYOUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MHSDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QYOUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
MHSDF (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а -12.73% price change this week, while QYOUF (@Movies/Entertainment) price change was +24.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +49.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.24%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (-0.64% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
| MHSDF | QYOUF | MHSDF / QYOUF | |
| Capitalization | 6.42B | 29.3M | 21,894% |
| EBITDA | 7.41B | -9.83M | -75,408% |
| Gain YTD | -12.727 | -51.186 | 25% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.63 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 27.7B | 29M | 95,517% |
| Total Cash | 1.65B | 3.71M | 44,456% |
| Total Debt | 4.28B | 426K | 1,004,225% |
MHSDF | QYOUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 31 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MHSDF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QYOUF (49). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QYOUF’s over the last 12 months.
MHSDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QYOUF (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to QYOUF’s over the last 12 months.
MHSDF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as QYOUF (98). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to QYOUF’s over the last 12 months.
MHSDF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as QYOUF (64). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to QYOUF’s over the last 12 months.
MHSDF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as QYOUF (100). This means that MHSDF’s stock grew similarly to QYOUF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
MHSDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MHSDF and CJREF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHSDF and CJREF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MHSDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHSDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CJREF - MHSDF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MCOIF - MHSDF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UMGP - MHSDF | 9% Poorly correlated | +24.75% | ||
| QYOUF - MHSDF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.61% | ||
| THBRF - MHSDF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||
QYOUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QYOUF and AIOSF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QYOUF and AIOSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYOUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYOUF | 100% | +2.61% | ||
| AIOSF - QYOUF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TOEAF - QYOUF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HOFV - QYOUF | 10% Poorly correlated | +7.85% | ||
| MCOIF - QYOUF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NETWF - QYOUF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||