MHIVF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
86.84M
NMEHF
Price
$5.60
Change
-$0.26 (-4.44%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
5.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MHIVF vs NMEHF

Header iconMHIVF vs NMEHF Comparison
Open Charts MHIVF vs NMEHFBanner chart's image
Invesque
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization86.84M
Nomura Real Estate Holdings
Price$5.60
Change-$0.26 (-4.44%)
Volume$1.16K
Capitalization5.28B
MHIVF vs NMEHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MHIVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MHIVF vs. NMEHF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MHIVF is a Buy and NMEHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (MHIVF: $0.09 vs. NMEHF: $5.60)
Brand notoriety: MHIVF and NMEHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MHIVF: 69% vs. NMEHF: 41%
Market capitalization -- MHIVF: $86.84M vs. NMEHF: $5.28B
MHIVF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $86.84M. NMEHF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $5.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MHIVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMEHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MHIVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMEHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMEHF is a better buy in the long-term than MHIVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MHIVF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMEHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MHIVF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NMEHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MHIVF is a better buy in the short-term than NMEHF.

Price Growth

MHIVF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +4.00% price change this week, while NMEHF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMEHF($5.28B) has a higher market cap than MHIVF($86.8M). MHIVF YTD gains are higher at: 33.714 vs. NMEHF (15.535).
MHIVFNMEHFMHIVF / NMEHF
Capitalization86.8M5.28B2%
EBITDA14.6MN/A-
Gain YTD33.71415.535217%
P/E RatioN/A9.51-
Revenue162MN/A-
Total Cash13.9MN/A-
Total Debt389MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MHIVF vs NMEHF: Fundamental Ratings
MHIVF
NMEHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3196
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10026
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4852
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8533

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMEHF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHIVF (72). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHIVF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MHIVF (100). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew significantly faster than MHIVF’s over the last 12 months.

MHIVF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (100). This means that MHIVF’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

NMEHF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as MHIVF (61). This means that NMEHF’s stock grew similarly to MHIVF’s over the last 12 months.

MHIVF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as NMEHF (52). This means that MHIVF’s stock grew similarly to NMEHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MHIVFNMEHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MHIVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMEHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGP8.450.04
+0.48%
PIMCO Global StockPLUS & Income Fund
PPT3.690.01
+0.27%
Putnam Premier Income Trust
NDVG34.79N/A
N/A
Nuveen Dividend Growth ETF
CSNR27.21-0.08
-0.28%
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Act ETF
FTLS67.46-0.21
-0.31%
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF

MHIVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHIVF and NMEHF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHIVF and NMEHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHIVF
1D Price
Change %
MHIVF100%
N/A
NMEHF - MHIVF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTAGY - MHIVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNGGF - MHIVF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
MEQYF - MHIVF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEGIF - MHIVF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A

NMEHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NMEHF and MHIVF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NMEHF and MHIVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMEHF
1D Price
Change %
NMEHF100%
N/A
MHIVF - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UK - NMEHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
SOHOF - NMEHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKTEF - NMEHF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - NMEHF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More