MGROF
Price
$0.69
Change
-$0.03 (-4.17%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
69.31M
VRDR
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
411.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGROF vs VRDR

Header iconMGROF vs VRDR Comparison
Open Charts MGROF vs VRDRBanner chart's image
MustGrow Biologics
Price$0.69
Change-$0.03 (-4.17%)
Volume$1.22K
Capitalization69.31M
Verde Resources
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.94K
Capitalization411.67M
MGROF vs VRDR Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGROF vs. VRDR commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGROF is a Hold and VRDR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (MGROF: $0.69 vs. VRDR: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: MGROF and VRDR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGROF: 59% vs. VRDR: 8%
Market capitalization -- MGROF: $69.31M vs. VRDR: $411.67M
MGROF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $69.31M. VRDR’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $411.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGROF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MGROF and VRDR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

MGROF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +7.90% price change this week, while VRDR (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -8.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+1.00% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VRDR($412M) has a higher market cap than MGROF($69.3M). MGROF YTD gains are higher at: -25.502 vs. VRDR (-69.606). VRDR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.57M vs. MGROF (-5.6M). MGROF has more cash in the bank: 6.1M vs. VRDR (241K). MGROF has less debt than VRDR: MGROF (759K) vs VRDR (1.46M). VRDR has higher revenues than MGROF: VRDR (155K) vs MGROF (5.03K).
MGROFVRDRMGROF / VRDR
Capitalization69.3M412M17%
EBITDA-5.6M-2.57M218%
Gain YTD-25.502-69.60637%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.03K155K3%
Total Cash6.1M241K2,533%
Total Debt759K1.46M52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VRDR: Fundamental Ratings
VRDR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGKPX26.44-0.13
-0.49%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder P
TOLLX16.70-0.12
-0.71%
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure A
PAULX41.95-0.54
-1.27%
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core Adv
MXXVX34.20-0.48
-1.38%
Matthew 25
WESCX20.61-0.43
-2.04%
TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity AAA

MGROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGROF has been loosely correlated with MULG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGROF jumps, then MULG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGROF
1D Price
Change %
MGROF100%
N/A
MULG - MGROF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VVIVF - MGROF
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.05%
CBLUF - MGROF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - MGROF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
SNFRF - MGROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VRDR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRDR and NUFMF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRDR and NUFMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRDR
1D Price
Change %
VRDR100%
-2.27%
NUFMF - VRDR
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNFRF - VRDR
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VVIVF - VRDR
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.05%
MGROF - VRDR
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YRAIF - VRDR
-3%
Poorly correlated
+4.72%
More