MGROF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.05 (-8.62%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
69.31M
SBMSF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
88.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGROF vs SBMSF

Header iconMGROF vs SBMSF Comparison
Open Charts MGROF vs SBMSFBanner chart's image
MustGrow Biologics
Price$0.53
Change-$0.05 (-8.62%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization69.31M
Danakali
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization88.4M
MGROF vs SBMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGROF vs. SBMSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGROF is a Hold and SBMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MGROF: $0.53 vs. SBMSF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: MGROF and SBMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGROF: 465% vs. SBMSF: 1%
Market capitalization -- MGROF: $69.31M vs. SBMSF: $88.4M
MGROF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $69.31M. SBMSF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $88.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGROF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the long-term than MGROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGROF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBMSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGROF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBMSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGROF is a better buy in the short-term than SBMSF.

Price Growth

MGROF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -9.62% price change this week, while SBMSF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+3.25% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBMSF($88.4M) has a higher market cap than MGROF($69.3M). MGROF YTD gains are higher at: -42.968 vs. SBMSF (-60.521). SBMSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.81M vs. MGROF (-5.6M). SBMSF has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. MGROF (6.1M). SBMSF has higher revenues than MGROF: SBMSF (18.2K) vs MGROF (5.03K).
MGROFSBMSFMGROF / SBMSF
Capitalization69.3M88.4M78%
EBITDA-5.6M-4.81M116%
Gain YTD-42.968-60.52171%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.03K18.2K28%
Total Cash6.1M22.9M27%
Total Debt759KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBMSF: Fundamental Ratings
SBMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGROFSBMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNHRX26.750.21
+0.79%
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term R
FWOZX17.510.13
+0.75%
Fidelity Advisor Women's Leadership Z
MSBVX12.240.09
+0.74%
Morgan Stanley American Resilience I
UIVAX19.930.10
+0.50%
Victory Value Institutional
FEYIX29.000.14
+0.49%
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 85% I

MGROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGROF has been loosely correlated with MULG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGROF jumps, then MULG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGROF
1D Price
Change %
MGROF100%
-8.98%
MULG - MGROF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VVIVF - MGROF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.80%
CBLUF - MGROF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - MGROF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
SNFRF - MGROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMSF and YRAIF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMSF and YRAIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMSF
1D Price
Change %
SBMSF100%
N/A
YRAIF - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUBC - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.38%
NUFMF - SBMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - SBMSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
MGROF - SBMSF
-5%
Poorly correlated
-8.98%
More