MGROF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
26.17M
SBMSF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
10.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGROF vs SBMSF

Header iconMGROF vs SBMSF Comparison
Open Charts MGROF vs SBMSFBanner chart's image
MustGrow Biologics
Price$0.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$518
Capitalization26.17M
Danakali
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization10.83M
MGROF vs SBMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGROF vs. SBMSF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGROF is a Hold and SBMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MGROF: $0.43 vs. SBMSF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: MGROF and SBMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGROF: 28% vs. SBMSF: 5%
Market capitalization -- MGROF: $26.17M vs. SBMSF: $10.83M
MGROF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $26.17M. SBMSF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $10.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $46.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGROF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the long-term than MGROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGROF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBMSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGROF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBMSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBMSF is a better buy in the short-term than MGROF.

Price Growth

MGROF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while SBMSF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -13.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+0.38% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGROF($26.2M) has a higher market cap than SBMSF($10.8M). MGROF YTD gains are higher at: -53.466 vs. SBMSF (-61.856).
MGROFSBMSFMGROF / SBMSF
Capitalization26.2M10.8M243%
EBITDA-5.75MN/A-
Gain YTD-53.466-61.85686%
P/E RatioN/A33.74-
Revenue7.03MN/A-
Total Cash1.82MN/A-
Total Debt3.14MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGROF vs SBMSF: Fundamental Ratings
MGROF
SBMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBMSF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGROF (92). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

MGROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SBMSF (100). This means that MGROF’s stock grew similarly to SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MGROF (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGROF (93). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MGROF (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to MGROF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGROFSBMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REMRF0.480.03
+6.57%
ATLAS SALT INC.
FNBT40.460.21
+0.52%
FineMark Holdings, Inc.
SVIN3.00N/A
N/A
Scheid Vineyards Inc.
JSGCF12.00N/A
N/A
LIXIL Corp.
ALFVY45.45-0.02
-0.04%
Alfa-Laval AB

MGROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGROF has been loosely correlated with MULG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGROF jumps, then MULG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGROF
1D Price
Change %
MGROF100%
N/A
MULG - MGROF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VVIVF - MGROF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.69%
CBLUF - MGROF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - MGROF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
SNFRF - MGROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMSF and YRAIF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMSF and YRAIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMSF
1D Price
Change %
SBMSF100%
+20.00%
YRAIF - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUBC - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUFMF - SBMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - SBMSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
MGROF - SBMSF
-5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More