It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MGROF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNUFMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MGROF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NUFMF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
MGROF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +17.99% price change this week, while NUFMF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.20%.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
MGROF | NUFMF | MGROF / NUFMF | |
Capitalization | 33.5M | 552M | 6% |
EBITDA | -5.75M | 271M | -2% |
Gain YTD | -37.266 | -25.652 | 145% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 103.60 | - |
Revenue | 7.03M | 3.4B | 0% |
Total Cash | 1.82M | 464M | 0% |
Total Debt | 3.14M | 1.1B | 0% |
MGROF | NUFMF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NUFMF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGROF (92). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.
MGROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as NUFMF (100). This means that MGROF’s stock grew similarly to NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.
NUFMF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as MGROF (100). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew similarly to MGROF’s over the last 12 months.
NUFMF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as MGROF (65). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew similarly to MGROF’s over the last 12 months.
NUFMF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MGROF (100). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew significantly faster than MGROF’s over the last 12 months.
MGROF | NUFMF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago23% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago29% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago46% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago36% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago30% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago30% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 10 days ago90% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago82% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago27% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago33% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MGROF and VRDR have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGROF and VRDR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MGROF | 100% | +15.41% | ||
VRDR - MGROF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
PUBC - MGROF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
YARIY - MGROF | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
NUFMF - MGROF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SNFRF - MGROF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NUFMF and SEED have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NUFMF and SEED's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NUFMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NUFMF | 100% | N/A | ||
SEED - NUFMF | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.09% | ||
VRDR - NUFMF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.52% | ||
MGROF - NUFMF | 3% Poorly correlated | +15.41% | ||
YARIY - NUFMF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.14% | ||
PUBC - NUFMF | 2% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
More |