MGROF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.05 (-8.62%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
69.31M
MULG
Price
$2.55
Change
-$4.45 (-63.57%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
269.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGROF vs MULG

Header iconMGROF vs MULG Comparison
Open Charts MGROF vs MULGBanner chart's image
MustGrow Biologics
Price$0.53
Change-$0.05 (-8.62%)
Volume$7.5K
Capitalization69.31M
Muliang Viagoo Technology
Price$2.55
Change-$4.45 (-63.57%)
Volume$249
Capitalization269.52M
MGROF vs MULG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGROF vs. MULG commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGROF is a Hold and MULG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MGROF: $0.53 vs. MULG: $2.55)
Brand notoriety: MGROF and MULG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGROF: 465% vs. MULG: 100%
Market capitalization -- MGROF: $69.31M vs. MULG: $269.52M
MGROF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $69.31M. MULG’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $269.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGROF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMULG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MULG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MULG is a better buy in the long-term than MGROF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGROF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MGROF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

MGROF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -9.62% price change this week, while MULG (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was +3.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (+3.62% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MULG($270M) has a higher market cap than MGROF($69.3M). MULG YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. MGROF (-42.968). MULG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.53M vs. MGROF (-5.6M). MGROF has more cash in the bank: 6.1M vs. MULG (55.7K). MGROF has less debt than MULG: MGROF (759K) vs MULG (1.62M). MULG has higher revenues than MGROF: MULG (11.1M) vs MGROF (5.03K).
MGROFMULGMGROF / MULG
Capitalization69.3M270M26%
EBITDA-5.6M2.53M-221%
Gain YTD-42.9680.000-
P/E RatioN/A206.49-
Revenue5.03K11.1M0%
Total Cash6.1M55.7K10,959%
Total Debt759K1.62M47%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGROF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDEVF0.610.02
+4.17%
Melco International Development Limited
PNAGF4.30N/A
N/A
Petronas Gas Berhad
MBHCF1.00N/A
N/A
MBH Corporation PLC
DVDDF4.31N/A
N/A
Dividend 15 Split Corp II
NTTYY26.65-0.31
-1.15%
NTT Inc

MGROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGROF has been loosely correlated with MULG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGROF jumps, then MULG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGROF
1D Price
Change %
MGROF100%
-8.98%
MULG - MGROF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
VVIVF - MGROF
6%
Poorly correlated
+4.80%
CBLUF - MGROF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YARIY - MGROF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
SNFRF - MGROF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MULG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MULG has been loosely correlated with MGROF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MULG jumps, then MGROF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MULG
1D Price
Change %
MULG100%
N/A
MGROF - MULG
38%
Loosely correlated
-8.98%
VNPKF - MULG
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.94%
LVRO - MULG
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.39%
BWEL - MULG
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
CBLUF - MULG
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More