MGPHF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.48M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMG
Price
$2.96
Change
-$0.17 (-5.43%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
453.59M
144 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGPHF vs NMG

Header iconMGPHF vs NMG Comparison
Open Charts MGPHF vs NMGBanner chart's image
Mason Resources
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$156.63K
Capitalization11.48M
Nouveau Monde Graphite
Price$2.96
Change-$0.17 (-5.43%)
Volume$1.53M
Capitalization453.59M
MGPHF vs NMG Comparison Chart in %
MGPHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGPHF vs. NMG commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGPHF is a Hold and NMG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (MGPHF: $0.07 vs. NMG: $3.13)
Brand notoriety: MGPHF and NMG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGPHF: 23% vs. NMG: 152%
Market capitalization -- MGPHF: $11.48M vs. NMG: $453.59M
MGPHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $11.48M. NMG’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $453.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGPHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGPHF is a better buy in the long-term than NMG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGPHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • NMG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMG is a better buy in the short-term than MGPHF.

Price Growth

MGPHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +3.82% price change this week, while NMG (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +25.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 07, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMG($454M) has a higher market cap than MGPHF($11.5M). NMG YTD gains are higher at: 96.855 vs. MGPHF (69.576). MGPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.62M vs. NMG (-53.18M). NMG has more cash in the bank: 73.5M vs. MGPHF (4.16M). MGPHF (0) and NMG (0) have equivalent revenues.
MGPHFNMGMGPHF / NMG
Capitalization11.5M454M3%
EBITDA-1.62M-53.18M3%
Gain YTD69.57696.85572%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.16M73.5M6%
Total DebtN/A18.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGPHF vs NMG: Fundamental Ratings
MGPHF
NMG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
772
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10096
SMR RATING
1..100
9497
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4641
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMG's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (54). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

NMG's Profit vs Risk Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (100). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPHF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as NMG (97). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew similarly to NMG’s over the last 12 months.

NMG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (46). This means that NMG’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MGPHF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMG (100). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGPHFNMG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMB60.43-0.17
-0.28%
Williams Companies
ISTR23.84-0.10
-0.42%
Investar Holding Corp
PENG20.76-0.11
-0.53%
Penguin Solutions Inc
ABCB73.91-1.00
-1.33%
Ameris Bancorp
CVU2.10-0.08
-3.67%
CPI Aerostructures

MGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPHF and NMG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPHF and NMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPHF
1D Price
Change %
MGPHF100%
+4.45%
NMG - MGPHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+12.19%
SHTLF - MGPHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNUF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPRGF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.65%
MALRF - MGPHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NMG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMG has been loosely correlated with ELBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMG jumps, then ELBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMG
1D Price
Change %
NMG100%
+12.19%
ELBM - NMG
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LGO - NMG
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
LAR - NMG
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.95%
CRML - NMG
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
CHNR - NMG
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More