MGPHF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
11.03M
MJDLF
Price
$7.44
Change
+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
608.69M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGPHF vs MJDLF

Header iconMGPHF vs MJDLF Comparison
Open Charts MGPHF vs MJDLFBanner chart's image
Mason Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.26K
Capitalization11.03M
Major Drilling Group International
Price$7.44
Change+$0.19 (+2.62%)
Volume$11.51K
Capitalization608.69M
MGPHF vs MJDLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGPHF vs. MJDLF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGPHF is a Hold and MJDLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MGPHF: $0.06 vs. MJDLF: $7.44)
Brand notoriety: MGPHF and MJDLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGPHF: 2% vs. MJDLF: 144%
Market capitalization -- MGPHF: $11.03M vs. MJDLF: $608.69M
MGPHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $11.03M. MJDLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $608.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGPHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMJDLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MGPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MJDLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the long-term than MGPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGPHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MJDLF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MJDLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MJDLF is a better buy in the short-term than MGPHF.

Price Growth

MGPHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.19% price change this week, while MJDLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MJDLF($609M) has a higher market cap than MGPHF($11M). MGPHF YTD gains are higher at: 58.853 vs. MJDLF (31.413). MJDLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 103M vs. MGPHF (-1.62M). MJDLF has more cash in the bank: 46M vs. MGPHF (4.16M). MJDLF has higher revenues than MGPHF: MJDLF (728M) vs MGPHF (0).
MGPHFMJDLFMGPHF / MJDLF
Capitalization11M609M2%
EBITDA-1.62M103M-2%
Gain YTD58.85331.413187%
P/E RatioN/A32.06-
Revenue0728M-
Total Cash4.16M46M9%
Total DebtN/A37.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MGPHF vs MJDLF: Fundamental Ratings
MGPHF
MJDLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
9685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
548
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGPHF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as MJDLF (79). This means that MGPHF’s stock grew similarly to MJDLF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGPHF (100). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (96). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as MGPHF (43). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew similarly to MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

MJDLF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGPHF (54). This means that MJDLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGPHFMJDLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MJDLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PASTX57.240.31
+0.54%
T. Rowe Price Science & Tech Adv
LCGRX25.49N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth Retail
FSCZX29.15-0.06
-0.21%
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
SOIUX21.07-0.05
-0.24%
Spirit of America Utilts Inst
CFGRX55.73-0.14
-0.25%
Commerce Growth

MGPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGPHF and FPRGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGPHF and FPRGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGPHF
1D Price
Change %
MGPHF100%
-0.09%
FPRGF - MGPHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.89%
MALRF - MGPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MKRIF - MGPHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
MDNGF - MGPHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+12.15%
MJDLF - MGPHF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
More

MJDLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MJDLF has been loosely correlated with AOTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MJDLF jumps, then AOTVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MJDLF
1D Price
Change %
MJDLF100%
+2.59%
AOTVF - MJDLF
33%
Loosely correlated
+8.01%
ERMAY - MJDLF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAMZF - MJDLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVPAF - MJDLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
SMDZF - MJDLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More