MGMNF
Price
$1.89
Change
-$0.04 (-2.07%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
386.78M
TSKFF
Price
$0.61
Change
+$0.04 (+7.02%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
87.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGMNF vs TSKFF

Header iconMGMNF vs TSKFF Comparison
Open Charts MGMNF vs TSKFFBanner chart's image
Magna Mining
Price$1.89
Change-$0.04 (-2.07%)
Volume$89.79K
Capitalization386.78M
Talisker Resources
Price$0.61
Change+$0.04 (+7.02%)
Volume$174.54K
Capitalization87.49M
MGMNF vs TSKFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MGMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGMNF vs. TSKFF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGMNF is a StrongBuy and TSKFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MGMNF: $1.89 vs. TSKFF: $0.61)
Brand notoriety: MGMNF and TSKFF are both not notable
MGMNF represents the Other Metals/Minerals, while TSKFF is part of the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGMNF: 109% vs. TSKFF: 106%
Market capitalization -- MGMNF: $386.78M vs. TSKFF: $87.49M
MGMNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $386.78M. TSKFF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $87.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGMNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSKFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MGMNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TSKFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGMNF is a better buy in the long-term than TSKFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MGMNF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSKFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MGMNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TSKFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGMNF is a better buy in the short-term than TSKFF.

Price Growth

MGMNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.01% price change this week, while TSKFF (@Precious Metals) price change was +13.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1000.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

@Precious Metals (+5.31% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGMNF($387M) has a higher market cap than TSKFF($87.5M). TSKFF YTD gains are higher at: 178.272 vs. MGMNF (103.247). MGMNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.7M vs. TSKFF (-11.12M). MGMNF has more cash in the bank: 38.3M vs. TSKFF (11.9M). TSKFF has less debt than MGMNF: TSKFF (6.2M) vs MGMNF (14.6M). MGMNF has higher revenues than TSKFF: MGMNF (4.45M) vs TSKFF (0).
MGMNFTSKFFMGMNF / TSKFF
Capitalization387M87.5M442%
EBITDA16.7M-11.12M-150%
Gain YTD103.247178.27258%
P/E Ratio87.09N/A-
Revenue4.45M0-
Total Cash38.3M11.9M322%
Total Debt14.6M6.2M235%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TSKFF: Fundamental Ratings
TSKFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGMNFTSKFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MGMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSKFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDNGF0.700.08
+12.15%
Midnight Sun Mining Corp
BUDFF59.930.55
+0.93%
Anheuser Busch Inbev SA NV
BCMRF0.07N/A
N/A
BCM Resources Corp.
DUERF24.98N/A
N/A
Duerr AG
NDRBF4.75N/A
N/A
Nibe Industrier AB

MGMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMNF and SLTFF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMNF and SLTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMNF
1D Price
Change %
MGMNF100%
-1.81%
SLTFF - MGMNF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PUTKY - MGMNF
25%
Poorly correlated
+3.73%
IONR - MGMNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+17.08%
TSKFF - MGMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+7.02%
MALRY - MGMNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
More

TSKFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSKFF and AXVEF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSKFF and AXVEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSKFF
1D Price
Change %
TSKFF100%
+7.02%
AXVEF - TSKFF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PJXRF - TSKFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.88%
MCHHF - TSKFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGMNF - TSKFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
TNREF - TSKFF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
More