MGM vs SKXJF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGM is a Buy and SKXJF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MGM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSKXJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MGM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SKXJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MGM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MGM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MGM (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while SKXJF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
MGM is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-1.57% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| MGM | SKXJF | MGM / SKXJF | |
| Capitalization | 15B | 2.48B | 605% |
| EBITDA | 2.75B | 49.4B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | -16.025 | 33.427 | -48% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.98 | 7.75 | 193% |
| Revenue | 16.2B | 143B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 2.93B | 242B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 31.6B | 20B | 158% |
MGM | SKXJF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SKXJF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGM (71) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SKXJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGM’s over the last 12 months.
SKXJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGM (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SKXJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGM’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's SMR Rating (40) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as SKXJF (59) in the null industry. This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to SKXJF’s over the last 12 months.
SKXJF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MGM (60) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SKXJF’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.
SKXJF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as MGM (67) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that SKXJF’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.
| MGM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
MGM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGM | 100% | -1.21% | ||
| CZR - MGM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| PENN - MGM | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| PLYA - MGM | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| HGV - MGM | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| CHDN - MGM | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||
SKXJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SKXJF and RANKF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SKXJF and RANKF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SKXJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKXJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RANKF - SKXJF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MGM - SKXJF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| KNDGF - SKXJF | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SGHC - SKXJF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LTRCF - SKXJF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||