It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MGM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePENN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MGM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PENN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
MGM (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -6.23% price change this week, while PENN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -4.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.04%.
MGM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
PENN is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
MGM | PENN | MGM / PENN | |
Capitalization | 9.3B | 2.48B | 376% |
EBITDA | 2.26B | 840M | 269% |
Gain YTD | -1.356 | -14.632 | 9% |
P/E Ratio | 18.68 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 17.2B | 6.64B | 259% |
Total Cash | 1.96B | 592M | 331% |
Total Debt | 31.2B | 11B | 284% |
MGM | PENN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PENN's Valuation (64) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MGM (75). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to MGM’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PENN (100). This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's SMR Rating (51) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PENN (92). This means that MGM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as PENN (62). This means that MGM’s stock grew similarly to PENN’s over the last 12 months.
MGM's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for PENN (100). This means that MGM’s stock grew significantly faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.
MGM | PENN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% | 4 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 4 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago83% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago70% | 20 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 5 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 4 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago68% | 4 days ago87% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JGRW | 26.75 | 0.19 | +0.71% |
Jensen Quality Growth ETF | |||
VIOV | 87.62 | 0.45 | +0.52% |
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | |||
JULQ | 24.81 | N/A | N/A |
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July | |||
BSMQ | 23.53 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
WTBN | 25.43 | -0.04 | -0.16% |
WisdomTree Bianco Fixed Inc Ttl Ret ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGM has been closely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGM jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PENN has been closely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PENN jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PENN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PENN | 100% | N/A | ||
BYD - PENN | 70% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
CZR - PENN | 70% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
MGM - PENN | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
INSE - PENN | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
GDEN - PENN | 57% Loosely correlated | -5.75% | ||
More |