Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGLCX vs SWASX
MGLCX vs SWASX Comparison
Open Charts MGLCX vs SWASX
MFS Global Real Estate C
Price$16.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
Schwab Global Real Estate
Price$6.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295M
MGLCX vs SWASX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGLCX vs. SWASX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGLCX is a Hold and SWASX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGLCX has more cash in the bank: 2.22B vs. SWASX (295M). SWASX pays higher dividends than MGLCX: SWASX (3.11) vs MGLCX (2.05). MGLCX was incepted earlier than SWASX: MGLCX (11 years) vs SWASX (19 years). MGLCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than SWASX (0.72). SWASX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. MGLCX (35.00). SWASX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLCX: SWASX (0) vs MGLCX (1000). SWASX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. MGLCX (7.14). SWASX return over 5 years is better than : 18.73 vs. MGLCX (-1.60).
| MGLCX | SWASX | MGLCX / SWASX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 0.72 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.72 | 271% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.916 | 2.663 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 295M | 753% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 3.11 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 16.90 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.36 | 19.12 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.60 | 18.73 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.37 | 50.06 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement