Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGIBX vs RERBX
MGIBX vs RERBX Comparison
Open Charts MGIBX vs RERBX
MFS International Intrinsic Value B
Price$41.32
Change+$0.33 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.75B
American Funds EUPAC R2
Price$60.03
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.04B
MGIBX vs RERBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGIBX vs. RERBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGIBX is a Hold and RERBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. MGIBX (23.7B). MGIBX pays higher dividends than RERBX: MGIBX (0.50) vs RERBX (0.25). MGIBX was incepted earlier than RERBX: MGIBX (30 years) vs RERBX (23 years). MGIBX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RERBX (1.56). RERBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. MGIBX (13.00). RERBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGIBX: RERBX (250) vs MGIBX (1000). RERBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.55 vs. MGIBX (2.32). RERBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.09 vs. MGIBX (-9.66).
| MGIBX | RERBX | MGIBX / RERBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.56 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.56 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.136 | 18.053 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.7B | 135B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.25 | 202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.32 | 4.55 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.87 | 47.57 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.66 | 12.09 | -80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.48 | 43.25 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement