Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MGFAX vs RPEBX
MGFAX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts MGFAX vs RPEBX
MassMutual Global A
Price$9.46
Change-$0.16 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.24M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$65.47
Change-$0.78 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.58B
MGFAX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MGFAX vs. RPEBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGFAX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 151B vs. MGFAX (161M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than MGFAX: RPEBX (0.13) vs MGFAX (0.00). MGFAX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: MGFAX (20 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). MGFAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. MGFAX (10.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGFAX: RPEBX (250) vs MGFAX (1000). RPEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.29 vs. MGFAX (-8.69). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.01 vs. MGFAX (-27.84).
| MGFAX | RPEBX | MGFAX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.21 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.21 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.956 | 8.448 | 47% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 161M | 151B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.69 | 8.29 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.58 | 41.34 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.84 | 45.01 | -62% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.98 | 70.57 | -54% |