MGAAF
Price
$15.51
Change
+$0.98 (+6.74%)
Updated
May 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.5B
WLMIF
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
19.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MGAAF vs WLMIF

Header iconMGAAF vs WLMIF Comparison
Open Charts MGAAF vs WLMIFBanner chart's image
Morinaga & Co
Price$15.51
Change+$0.98 (+6.74%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.5B
Wilmar International
Price$2.35
Change+$0.18 (+8.29%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization19.51B
MGAAF vs WLMIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MGAAF vs. WLMIF commentary
Jun 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MGAAF is a Hold and WLMIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2025
Stock price -- (MGAAF: $15.51 vs. WLMIF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: MGAAF and WLMIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MGAAF: 100% vs. WLMIF: 3%
Market capitalization -- MGAAF: $1.5B vs. WLMIF: $19.51B
MGAAF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $1.5B. WLMIF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $19.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MGAAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MGAAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLMIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MGAAF and WLMIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WLMIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WLMIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MGAAF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WLMIF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WLMIF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than MGAAF($1.5B). MGAAF has higher P/E ratio than WLMIF: MGAAF (20.92) vs WLMIF (8.61). WLMIF YTD gains are higher at: 6.818 vs. MGAAF (0.000). MGAAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.4B vs. WLMIF (5.01B). MGAAF has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. WLMIF (3.74B). MGAAF has less debt than WLMIF: MGAAF (19B) vs WLMIF (32.3B). MGAAF has higher revenues than WLMIF: MGAAF (190B) vs WLMIF (72.4B).
MGAAFWLMIFMGAAF / WLMIF
Capitalization1.5B19.5B8%
EBITDA34.4B5.01B686%
Gain YTD0.0006.818-
P/E Ratio20.928.61243%
Revenue190B72.4B262%
Total Cash46.7B3.74B1,249%
Total Debt19B32.3B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WLMIF: Fundamental Ratings
WLMIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MGAAFWLMIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WLMIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USPCX29.450.28
+0.96%
Union Street Partners Value C
RGGHX39.410.12
+0.31%
American Funds Global Balanced R2E
TSCSX30.600.02
+0.07%
Thrivent Small Cap Stock S
GSXAX36.870.02
+0.05%
abrdn US Small Cap Equity A
INIIX22.47-0.99
-4.22%
VanEck International Investors Gold I

MGAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGAAF and LSF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGAAF and LSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGAAF
1D Price
Change %
MGAAF100%
N/A
LSF - MGAAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.69%
BTSDF - MGAAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - MGAAF
0%
Poorly correlated
+8.10%
WWNTF - MGAAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTY - MGAAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WLMIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMIF and YMZBY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMIF and YMZBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMIF
1D Price
Change %
WLMIF100%
+8.10%
YMZBY - WLMIF
25%
Poorly correlated
+17.84%
ASBFY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
TUFBY - WLMIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATPC - WLMIF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
WLMIY - WLMIF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More