MG
Price
$9.89
Change
-$0.19 (-1.88%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
292.87M
10 days until earnings call
NAUH
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Feb 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.4M
Ad is loading...

MG vs NAUH

Header iconMG vs NAUH Comparison
Open Charts MG vs NAUHBanner chart's image
Mistras Group
Price$9.89
Change-$0.19 (-1.88%)
Volume$97.05K
Capitalization292.87M
National American University Holdings
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.4M
MG vs NAUH Comparison Chart
Loading...
MG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MG vs. NAUH commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MG is a Hold and NAUH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (MG: $9.89 vs. NAUH: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: MG and NAUH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MG: 79% vs. NAUH: 9%
Market capitalization -- MG: $292.87M vs. NAUH: $1.4M
MG [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $292.87M. NAUH’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $1.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNAUH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NAUH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NAUH is a better buy in the long-term than MG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

MG (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -1.88% price change this week, while NAUH (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +92.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

MG is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

NAUH is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-1.23% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MG($293M) has a higher market cap than NAUH($1.4M). MG has higher P/E ratio than NAUH: MG (66.67) vs NAUH (0.34). NAUH YTD gains are higher at: 90.881 vs. MG (9.161). MG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 32.2M vs. NAUH (4.51M). MG has more cash in the bank: 17.6M vs. NAUH (120K). NAUH has less debt than MG: NAUH (585K) vs MG (218M). MG has higher revenues than NAUH: MG (705M) vs NAUH (11.6M).
MGNAUHMG / NAUH
Capitalization293M1.4M20,974%
EBITDA32.2M4.51M715%
Gain YTD9.16190.88110%
P/E Ratio66.670.3419,545%
Revenue705M11.6M6,078%
Total Cash17.6M120K14,667%
Total Debt218M585K37,265%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MG vs NAUH: Fundamental Ratings
MG
NAUH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1527
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
82100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
372
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NAUH's Valuation (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MG (75) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NAUH’s stock grew similarly to MG’s over the last 12 months.

NAUH's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MG (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NAUH’s stock grew similarly to MG’s over the last 12 months.

MG's SMR Rating (82) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as NAUH (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MG’s stock grew similarly to NAUH’s over the last 12 months.

MG's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as NAUH (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MG’s stock grew similarly to NAUH’s over the last 12 months.

NAUH's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MG (37) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that NAUH’s stock grew somewhat faster than MG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

MG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MG has been loosely correlated with REZI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MG jumps, then REZI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MG
1D Price
Change %
MG100%
-1.88%
REZI - MG
37%
Loosely correlated
-9.24%
MSA - MG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
AZZ - MG
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
RGP - MG
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
LAUR - MG
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.53%
More

NAUH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NAUH and SCTBF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NAUH and SCTBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAUH
1D Price
Change %
NAUH100%
N/A
SCTBF - NAUH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRU - NAUH
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
NL - NAUH
14%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
UTI - NAUH
12%
Poorly correlated
-8.11%
MG - NAUH
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
More