Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.30
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.93M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.1B vs. MFLDX (91.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFLDX (1.02) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. NLSIX (8.31). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.86 vs. NLSIX (23.72).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.32 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.541 | 8.000 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.9M | 8.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.02 | 5,040% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.19 | 8.31 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.92 | 23.64 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.86 | 23.72 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 65.72 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement