Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.22
Change-$0.16 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.95M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.06
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. MFLDX (91M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than MFLDX: NLSIX (0.05) vs MFLDX (0.02). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.92 vs. NLSIX (7.46). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 34.92 vs. NLSIX (24.29).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.32 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.071 | 0.299 | 358% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91M | 7.99B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.05 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.92 | 7.46 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 28.29 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.92 | 24.29 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.17 | 72.34 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers