Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSIX
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.32
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.35M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.10
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
MFLDX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSIX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a StrongBuy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. MFLDX (91.3M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFLDX (1.02) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFLDX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFLDX (100000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.41 vs. NLSIX (6.04). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 43.46 vs. NLSIX (22.14).
| MFLDX | NLSIX | MFLDX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.32 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.32 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.628 | 7.200 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.3M | 7.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.02 | 5,018% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.41 | 6.04 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.07 | 21.20 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.46 | 22.14 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.19 | 65.96 | 137% |