Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSCX
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSCX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.27
Change-$0.20 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.23M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.12B vs. MFLDX (90.2M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: MFLDX (0.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: MFLDX (19 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than MFLDX (2.09). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSCX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. NLSCX (2.04). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 34.06 vs. NLSCX (13.95).
| MFLDX | NLSCX | MFLDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 2.43 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.43 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.664 | -1.067 | -62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.2M | 8.12B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.38 | 2.04 | 756% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.44 | 22.08 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.06 | 13.95 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.78 | 52.11 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers