Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSCX
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSCX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.30
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.93M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.1B vs. MFLDX (91.9M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: MFLDX (1.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than MFLDX (2.09). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSCX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. NLSCX (7.07). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 46.86 vs. NLSCX (16.58).
| MFLDX | NLSCX | MFLDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 2.43 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.43 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.541 | 6.953 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.9M | 8.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.19 | 7.07 | 201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.92 | 19.29 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.86 | 16.58 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 47.75 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement