Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSCX
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSCX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.35
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.09M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
MFLDX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. MFLDX (91.1M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: MFLDX (1.02) vs NLSCX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than MFLDX (2.09). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSCX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.56 vs. NLSCX (5.16). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 39.86 vs. NLSCX (16.45).
| MFLDX | NLSCX | MFLDX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 2.43 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 2.43 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.758 | 6.049 | 310% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.1M | 7.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.56 | 5.16 | 321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.27 | 25.44 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.86 | 16.45 | 242% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.30 | 45.89 | 199% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement