Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSAX
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSAX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.47
Change+$1.01 (+3.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.12M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. MFLDX (91.1M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MFLDX (0.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MFLDX (19 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSAX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.18 vs. NLSAX (3.43). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. NLSAX (19.35).
| MFLDX | NLSAX | MFLDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.68 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.68 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.403 | -0.609 | -231% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.1M | 8.16B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.18 | 3.43 | 472% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.37 | 25.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.47 | 19.35 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.25 | 64.99 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement