Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSAX
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSAX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$26.91
Change-$0.39 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.97M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.80
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.07B vs. MFLDX (92M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MFLDX (1.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSAX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. NLSAX (7.38). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 44.76 vs. NLSAX (20.86).
| MFLDX | NLSAX | MFLDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.68 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.68 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.848 | 7.259 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92M | 8.07B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 7.38 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.92 | 21.97 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.76 | 20.86 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.34 | 58.44 | 149% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement