Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFLDX vs NLSAX
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MFLDX vs NLSAX
Cromwell Long Short Institutional
Price$27.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.11M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
MFLDX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFLDX vs. NLSAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFLDX is a Hold and NLSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. MFLDX (91.1M). MFLDX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MFLDX (1.02) vs NLSAX (0.00). MFLDX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MFLDX (18 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). MFLDX (2.09) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). MFLDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFLDX: NLSAX (1000) vs MFLDX (100000). MFLDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.61 vs. NLSAX (6.02). MFLDX return over 5 years is better than : 39.86 vs. NLSAX (21.23).
| MFLDX | NLSAX | MFLDX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.68 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 1.68 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.758 | 6.934 | 271% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.1M | 7.96B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.61 | 6.02 | 276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.35 | 28.66 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.86 | 21.23 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.30 | 57.45 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement