Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFJBX vs RFUTX
MFJBX vs RFUTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFJBX vs. RFUTX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFJBX is a Hold and RFUTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFUTX has more cash in the bank: 18.3B vs. MFJBX (258M). MFJBX pays higher dividends than RFUTX: MFJBX (1.69) vs RFUTX (1.00). MFJBX was incepted earlier than RFUTX: MFJBX (9 years) vs RFUTX (11 years). MFJBX (1.93) is less costly to investors than RFUTX (0.39). MFJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RFUTX (5.00). RFUTX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFJBX: RFUTX (250) vs MFJBX (1000). RFUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.84 vs. MFJBX (11.24). MFJBX (54.24) and RFUTX (53.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| MFJBX | RFUTX | MFJBX / RFUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.39 | 405% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.39 | 495% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.691 | 18.238 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 18.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.00 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.24 | 15.84 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.20 | 56.23 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.24 | 53.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 127.81 | - |