MFIC
Price
$12.21
Change
-$0.30 (-2.40%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
970.97M
53 days until earnings call
MSDL
Price
$19.45
Change
-$0.03 (-0.15%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.92B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFIC vs MSDL

Header iconMFIC vs MSDL Comparison
Open Charts MFIC vs MSDLBanner chart's image
MidCap Financial Investment
Price$12.21
Change-$0.30 (-2.40%)
Volume$585.96K
Capitalization970.97M
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
Price$19.45
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
Volume$317.2K
Capitalization1.92B
MFIC vs MSDL Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFIC vs. MSDL commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFIC is a Hold and MSDL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MFIC: $12.21 vs. MSDL: $19.45)
Brand notoriety: MFIC and MSDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFIC: 147% vs. MSDL: 77%
Market capitalization -- MFIC: $970.97M vs. MSDL: $1.92B
MFIC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $970.97M. MSDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFIC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMSDL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFIC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MSDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFIC is a better buy in the long-term than MSDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFIC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSDL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFIC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSDL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSDL is a better buy in the short-term than MFIC.

Price Growth

MFIC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while MSDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFIC is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

MSDL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSDL($1.92B) has a higher market cap than MFIC($971M). MSDL (8.24) and MFIC (8.18) have similar P/E ratio . MSDL YTD gains are higher at: -3.523 vs. MFIC (-3.993). MSDL has more cash in the bank: 88.1M vs. MFIC (16.5M). MFIC (1.46B) and MSDL (1.5B) have identical debt. MSDL has higher revenues than MFIC: MSDL (257M) vs MFIC (133M).
MFICMSDLMFIC / MSDL
Capitalization971M1.92B51%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.993-3.523113%
P/E Ratio8.188.2499%
Revenue133M257M52%
Total Cash16.5M88.1M19%
Total Debt1.46B1.5B98%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFIC: Fundamental Ratings
MFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
21
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFICMSDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBLAX39.14-0.26
-0.66%
American Funds Global Balanced A
IRGJX49.89-0.62
-1.23%
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Idx Port I
FVLZX34.04-0.47
-1.36%
Fidelity Advisor Value Z
JVTNX82.70-1.24
-1.48%
Janus Henderson Venture N
TSLFX4.63-0.08
-1.70%
Transamerica Small Cap Value R4

MFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIC has been closely correlated with SLRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFIC jumps, then SLRC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIC
1D Price
Change %
MFIC100%
-2.40%
SLRC - MFIC
76%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
NMFC - MFIC
74%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
ARCC - MFIC
73%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
GBDC - MFIC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.88%
BXSL - MFIC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
More

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been loosely correlated with BXSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then BXSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
-0.15%
BXSL - MSDL
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
CSWC - MSDL
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
MFIC - MSDL
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
BCSF - MSDL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
FSK - MSDL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More