MFGI
Price
$25.18
Change
+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
225.32M
NASB
Price
$33.32
Change
+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
215.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFGI vs NASB

Header iconMFGI vs NASB Comparison
Open Charts MFGI vs NASBBanner chart's image
Merchants Financial Group
Price$25.18
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
Volume$3.01K
Capitalization225.32M
NASB Financial
Price$33.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.12%)
Volume$200
Capitalization215.55M
MFGI vs NASB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NASB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFGI vs. NASB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFGI is a Hold and NASB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (MFGI: $25.17 vs. NASB: $33.32)
Brand notoriety: MFGI and NASB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFGI: 160% vs. NASB: 35%
Market capitalization -- MFGI: $225.32M vs. NASB: $215.55M
MFGI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $225.32M. NASB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $215.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFGI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNASB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MFGI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NASB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MFGI and NASB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFGI’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NASB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFGI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NASB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NASB is a better buy in the short-term than MFGI.

Price Growth

MFGI (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while NASB (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFGI($225M) and NASB($216M) have the same market capitalization . MFGI YTD gains are higher at: 1.241 vs. NASB (-9.706).
MFGINASBMFGI / NASB
Capitalization225M216M104%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.241-9.706-13%
P/E RatioN/A7.51-
RevenueN/A124M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A628M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFGI vs NASB: Fundamental Ratings
MFGI
NASB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8295
SMR RATING
1..100
540
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1649
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
165

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NASB's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as MFGI (20). This means that NASB’s stock grew similarly to MFGI’s over the last 12 months.

MFGI's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as NASB (95). This means that MFGI’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.

MFGI's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NASB (40). This means that MFGI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NASB’s over the last 12 months.

MFGI's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as NASB (61). This means that MFGI’s stock grew similarly to NASB’s over the last 12 months.

MFGI's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NASB (49). This means that MFGI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NASB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGINASB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NASB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MNRGX42.250.40
+0.96%
Manor Growth
GWEIX33.150.22
+0.67%
AMG GW&K Small Cap Core I
HSEIX12.350.08
+0.65%
Hartford Small Cap Value I
TEMPX9.000.04
+0.45%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Prem
GTECX47.120.14
+0.30%
Gateway C

MFGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFGI has been loosely correlated with BQCNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFGI jumps, then BQCNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGI
1D Price
Change %
MFGI100%
+0.10%
BQCNF - MFGI
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PNBI - MFGI
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NASB - MFGI
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
OPHC - MFGI
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
MFDB - MFGI
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NASB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NASB and SSB have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NASB and SSB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NASB
1D Price
Change %
NASB100%
+0.10%
SSB - NASB
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
FHB - NASB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
OZK - NASB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
FFIC - NASB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.92%
ORRF - NASB
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More