MFGCF
Price
$1.30
Change
+$0.11 (+9.24%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
141.9M
SITKF
Price
$0.57
Change
-$0.02 (-3.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
213.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFGCF vs SITKF

Header iconMFGCF vs SITKF Comparison
Open Charts MFGCF vs SITKFBanner chart's image
Mayfair Gold
Price$1.30
Change+$0.11 (+9.24%)
Volume$300
Capitalization141.9M
Sitka Gold
Price$0.57
Change-$0.02 (-3.39%)
Volume$405.95K
Capitalization213.26M
MFGCF vs SITKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFGCF vs. SITKF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFGCF is a StrongBuy and SITKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MFGCF: $1.30 vs. SITKF: $0.57)
Brand notoriety: MFGCF and SITKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFGCF: 3% vs. SITKF: 223%
Market capitalization -- MFGCF: $141.9M vs. SITKF: $213.26M
MFGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $141.9M. SITKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $213.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSITKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MFGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SITKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SITKF is a better buy in the long-term than MFGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFGCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SITKF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SITKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MFGCF and SITKF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MFGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.14% price change this week, while SITKF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SITKF($213M) has a higher market cap than MFGCF($142M). SITKF YTD gains are higher at: 126.460 vs. MFGCF (1.250). SITKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.22M vs. MFGCF (-12.87M). SITKF has more cash in the bank: 14.7M vs. MFGCF (7.69M). MFGCF (0) and SITKF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MFGCFSITKFMFGCF / SITKF
Capitalization142M213M67%
EBITDA-12.87M-3.22M400%
Gain YTD1.250126.4601%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.69M14.7M52%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SITKF: Fundamental Ratings
SITKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
19
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGCFSITKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SITKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KCSIX13.890.16
+1.17%
Knights of Columbus Small Cap I
HRCUX66.840.68
+1.03%
Carillon ClariVest Capital Apprec R6
BMCCX18.900.17
+0.91%
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv C
VGENX48.380.05
+0.10%
Vanguard Energy Inv
RBCIX11.36-0.22
-1.90%
RBC China Equity I

MFGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFGCF and EMAUF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFGCF and EMAUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGCF
1D Price
Change %
MFGCF100%
+8.91%
EMAUF - MFGCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.46%
VITFF - MFGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MFGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
SITKF - MFGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
ENDGF - MFGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More

SITKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SITKF and BYAGF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SITKF and BYAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SITKF
1D Price
Change %
SITKF100%
-4.04%
BYAGF - SITKF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
SLVMF - SITKF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMDRF - SITKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSRPF - SITKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
MFGCF - SITKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.91%
More