MFG vs WF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Hold and WF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- MFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.85% price change this week, while WF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
MFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
WF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.80% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| MFG | WF | MFG / WF | |
| Capitalization | 49.2B | 7.73B | 636% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.822 | 18.815 | 217% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.31 | 3.62 | 312% |
| Revenue | 2.88T | 11.84T | 24% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 20.53T | N/A | - |
MFG | WF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 1 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WF's Valuation (4) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (47). This means that WF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.
WF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (10). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.
WF's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (1). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.
MFG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WF (56). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to WF’s over the last 12 months.
WF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (37). This means that WF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.
| MFG | WF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 0% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 57% |
MFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFG | 100% | +5.31% | ||
| SUTNY - MFG | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| CFB - MFG | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| WF - MFG | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| SHG - MFG | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| SFST - MFG | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
More | ||||
WF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WF has been closely correlated with SHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WF jumps, then SHG could also see price increases.