MFG
Price
$6.51
Change
-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
81.62B
68 days until earnings call
UBAB
Price
$55.74
Change
+$0.46 (+0.83%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
183.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs UBAB

Header iconMFG vs UBAB Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs UBABBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization81.62B
United Bancorporation of Alabama
Price$55.74
Change+$0.46 (+0.83%)
Volume$4.3K
Capitalization183.28M
MFG vs UBAB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. UBAB commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Buy and UBAB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $6.51 vs. UBAB: $55.74)
Brand notoriety: MFG and UBAB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 70% vs. UBAB: 149%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $81.62B vs. UBAB: $183.28M
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $81.62B. UBAB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $183.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBAB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBAB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBAB is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBAB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBAB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and UBAB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while UBAB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($81.6B) has a higher market cap than UBAB($183M). MFG has higher P/E ratio than UBAB: MFG (13.69) vs UBAB (8.88). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 33.129 vs. UBAB (-0.884). UBAB has less debt than MFG: UBAB (33.3M) vs MFG (22.19T). MFG has higher revenues than UBAB: MFG (3.61T) vs UBAB (76.7M).
MFGUBABMFG / UBAB
Capitalization81.6B183M44,590%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.129-0.884-3,748%
P/E Ratio13.698.88154%
Revenue3.61T76.7M4,706,649%
Total CashN/A31.4M-
Total Debt22.19T33.3M66,630,631%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs UBAB: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
UBAB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7230
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
158
SMR RATING
1..100
142
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2514
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UBAB's Valuation (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (72) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBAB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

UBAB's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (15) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBAB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBAB (42) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBAB’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBAB (52) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to UBAB’s over the last 12 months.

UBAB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (25) in the Major Banks industry. This means that UBAB’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGUBAB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBAB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USEMX24.480.23
+0.95%
Victory Emerging Markets
WMCVX10.020.01
+0.10%
Wasatch Small Cap Value
MNRMX41.91N/A
N/A
Manor
CLGEX76.78N/A
N/A
Columbia Cornerstone Growth E
TRGVX19.69N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Glbl Val Eq

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.46%
NWG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
DB - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
HBAN - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
WNEB - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
TFC - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More

UBAB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBAB and CBBI have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBAB and CBBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBAB
1D Price
Change %
UBAB100%
N/A
CBBI - UBAB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
AMTB - UBAB
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
MFG - UBAB
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.46%
ISNPY - UBAB
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
CFG - UBAB
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More