MFG
Price
$6.51
Change
-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
81.62B
68 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$46.52
Change
-$0.55 (-1.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
59.98B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs TFC

Header iconMFG vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs TFCBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.51
Change-$0.03 (-0.46%)
Volume$2.05M
Capitalization81.62B
Truist Financial
Price$46.52
Change-$0.55 (-1.17%)
Volume$7.85M
Capitalization59.98B
MFG vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. TFC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Buy and TFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $6.51 vs. TFC: $46.52)
Brand notoriety: MFG and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 70% vs. TFC: 106%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $81.62B vs. TFC: $59.98B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $81.62B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than MFG.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($81.6B) has a higher market cap than TFC($60B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than TFC: MFG (13.69) vs TFC (12.61). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 33.129 vs. TFC (11.247). TFC has less debt than MFG: TFC (61.1B) vs MFG (22.19T).
MFGTFCMFG / TFC
Capitalization81.6B60B136%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.12911.247295%
P/E Ratio13.6912.61109%
Revenue3.61TN/A-
Total CashN/A5.16B-
Total Debt22.19T61.1B36,314%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
729
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1566
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4324
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2543
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (72) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (75) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (66) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (4) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's Price Growth Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MFG (43) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (43) in the null industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGTFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DUKX24.780.19
+0.77%
Ocean Park International ETF
KXI66.080.23
+0.35%
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF
RSP188.440.22
+0.12%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF
ATFV32.640.01
+0.02%
Alger 35 ETF
NRO3.28-0.01
-0.15%
Neuberger Berman Real Estate Sec Income Fund

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.46%
NWG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
DB - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
HBAN - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.40%
WNEB - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
TFC - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
More

TFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TFC
1D Price
Change %
TFC100%
-1.17%
HBAN - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.40%
CFG - TFC
92%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
PNC - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
FITB - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
KEY - TFC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
More