MFG
Price
$6.23
Change
-$0.05 (-0.80%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
75.23B
27 days until earnings call
SHG
Price
$52.37
Change
+$0.80 (+1.55%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
24.96B
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs SHG

Header iconMFG vs SHG Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs SHGBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.23
Change-$0.05 (-0.80%)
Volume$2.17M
Capitalization75.23B
Shinhan Financial Group
Price$52.37
Change+$0.80 (+1.55%)
Volume$267.54K
Capitalization24.96B
MFG vs SHG Comparison Chart in %
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. SHG commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Hold and SHG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $6.23 vs. SHG: $52.37)
Brand notoriety: MFG and SHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 104% vs. SHG: 124%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $75.65B vs. SHG: $24.96B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $75.65B. SHG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSHG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SHG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and SHG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SHG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SHG is a better buy in the short-term than MFG.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.30% price change this week, while SHG (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 14, 2025.

SHG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($75.2B) has a higher market cap than SHG($25B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than SHG: MFG (13.36) vs SHG (8.10). SHG YTD gains are higher at: 59.276 vs. MFG (27.403). MFG has less debt than SHG: MFG (22.19T) vs SHG (129.76T). SHG has higher revenues than MFG: SHG (17.98T) vs MFG (3.61T).
MFGSHGMFG / SHG
Capitalization75.2B25B301%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.40359.27646%
P/E Ratio13.368.10165%
Revenue3.61T17.98T20%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt22.19T129.76T17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs SHG: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
SHG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1817
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1823
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5032

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (72) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (88) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SHG (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to SHG’s over the last 12 months.

SHG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MFG (46) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SHG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

SHG's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MFG (29) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SHG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGSHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHEM32.320.08
+0.26%
JHancock Multifactor Em Mkts ETF
FOXY27.580.02
+0.06%
Simplify Currency Strategy ETF
SCHI23.18-0.03
-0.13%
Schwab 5-10 Year Corp Bd ETF
EFNL43.55-0.07
-0.16%
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
MPA11.34-0.07
-0.61%
Blackrock Muniyield Pennsylvania Quality Fund

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.80%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
DB - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.30%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
HBAN - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
WNEB - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More

SHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHG has been closely correlated with KB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHG jumps, then KB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHG
1D Price
Change %
SHG100%
+1.55%
KB - SHG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
WF - SHG
76%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
SBNY - SHG
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CADE - SHG
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
MFG - SHG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
More