Advertisement
MFG vs SCHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Hold and SCHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.84% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
MFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
MFG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MFG | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 14 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 47% | about 1 month ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KCCA | 16.89 | 0.37 | +2.24% |
| KraneShares California Carbon Allw ETF | |||
| RSPU | 75.87 | 0.70 | +0.93% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF | |||
| FSCC | 31.61 | 0.17 | +0.54% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | |||
| CWB | 93.42 | 0.08 | +0.09% |
| State Street® SPDR® Blmbg Cnvrt Secs ETF | |||
| ARLU | 30.63 | -0.14 | -0.47% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncAprETF | |||
MFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFG | 100% | +2.19% | ||
| SUTNY - MFG | 71% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| HBAN - MFG | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| RF - MFG | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| NWG - MFG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| LYG - MFG | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| STM - SCHF | 79% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 75% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| MFG - SCHF | 70% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| BBVA - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||