MFG
Price
$7.42
Change
-$0.04 (-0.54%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
90.72B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RF
Price
$27.73
Change
+$0.18 (+0.65%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
24.32B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs RF

Header iconMFG vs RF Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs RFBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$7.42
Change-$0.04 (-0.54%)
Volume$2.98M
Capitalization90.72B
Regions Financial
Price$27.73
Change+$0.18 (+0.65%)
Volume$4.77M
Capitalization24.32B
MFG vs RF Comparison Chart in %
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. RF commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a StrongBuy and RF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $7.42 vs. RF: $27.73)
Brand notoriety: MFG: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 94% vs. RF: 23%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $90.72B vs. RF: $24.32B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $90.72B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the long-term than RF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and RF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.63% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($90.7B) has a higher market cap than RF($24.3B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than RF: MFG (14.38) vs RF (12.22). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 51.738 vs. RF (21.740). RF has less debt than MFG: RF (6.09B) vs MFG (24.87T). MFG has higher revenues than RF: MFG (3.7T) vs RF (7.42B).
MFGRFMFG / RF
Capitalization90.7B24.3B373%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD51.73821.740238%
P/E Ratio14.3812.22118%
Revenue3.7T7.42B49,825%
Total CashN/A3.25B-
Total Debt24.87T6.09B408,644%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1322
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1128
SMR RATING
1..100
17
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4122
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2462
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RF's Valuation (62) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (71). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (28). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (7). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Price Growth Rating (22) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (41). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RF (62). This means that MFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JOJO15.610.03
+0.17%
ATAC Credit Rotation ETF
FCLD30.090.04
+0.13%
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
MUNI52.530.05
+0.10%
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bd Actv ETF
HIX4.07-0.01
-0.25%
Western Asset High Income Fund II
WILD20.77-0.12
-0.59%
Vistashares Animal Spirits Daily 2X Strategy ETF

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
-0.54%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
HBAN - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
DB - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
RF - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.65%
FITB - RF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
HBAN - RF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
PNC - RF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
MTB - RF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
FNB - RF
76%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
More