MFG
Price
$8.49
Change
+$0.10 (+1.19%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
104.36B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NWG
Price
$17.13
Change
+$0.05 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jan 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
67.43B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs NWG

Header iconMFG vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs NWGBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$8.49
Change+$0.10 (+1.19%)
Volume$42.79K
Capitalization104.36B
NatWest Group
Price$17.13
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
Volume$11.22K
Capitalization67.43B
MFG vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. NWG commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Hold and NWG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (MFG: $8.39 vs. NWG: $17.08)
Brand notoriety: MFG and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 126% vs. NWG: 122%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $105.49B vs. NWG: $67.63B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $105.49B. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $67.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and NWG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.84% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.

NWG is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($104B) has a higher market cap than NWG($67.4B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than NWG: MFG (16.57) vs NWG (9.88). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 14.617 vs. NWG (-2.400). NWG has less debt than MFG: NWG (6.14B) vs MFG (24.87T). MFG has higher revenues than NWG: MFG (3.7T) vs NWG (16.1B).
MFGNWGMFG / NWG
Capitalization104B67.4B154%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.617-2.400-609%
P/E Ratio16.579.88168%
Revenue3.7T16.1B22,963%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt24.87T6.14B405,248%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2483
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (78) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (81). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (8). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (5). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (41). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (24). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGTX15.901.39
+9.58%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RGTI ETF
MOAT107.270.47
+0.44%
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
FAX15.410.06
+0.39%
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund
MHF6.980.01
+0.14%
Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund
TSLP22.83-0.52
-2.23%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Tesla ETF

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+2.19%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
HBAN - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
RF - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
LYG - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+0.71%
LYG - NWG
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
DB - NWG
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
More