MFG
Price
$6.68
Change
+$0.18 (+2.77%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
79.89B
89 days until earnings call
NWG
Price
$14.83
Change
-$0.34 (-2.24%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
59.06B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs NWG

Header iconMFG vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs NWGBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$6.68
Change+$0.18 (+2.77%)
Volume$2.34M
Capitalization79.89B
NatWest Group
Price$14.83
Change-$0.34 (-2.24%)
Volume$3.72M
Capitalization59.06B
MFG vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. NWG commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Hold and NWG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (MFG: $6.50 vs. NWG: $15.17)
Brand notoriety: MFG and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 58% vs. NWG: 72%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $79.89B vs. NWG: $59.06B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $79.89B. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $59.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.41B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than MFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the short-term than MFG.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.86% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

NWG is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($79.9B) has a higher market cap than NWG($59.1B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than NWG: MFG (13.65) vs NWG (9.57). NWG YTD gains are higher at: 57.151 vs. MFG (32.924).
MFGNWGMFG / NWG
Capitalization79.9B59.1B135%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD32.92457.15158%
P/E Ratio13.659.57143%
Revenue3.61TN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt22.19TN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
143
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2426
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWG's Valuation (32) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFG (72). This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (14). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (5). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (41). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (26). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBLC42.721.11
+2.68%
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
FDEV32.91-0.03
-0.09%
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
OIH239.63-0.73
-0.30%
VanEck Oil Services ETF
IJR115.15-1.65
-1.41%
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
MARO18.29-1.36
-6.92%
Yieldmax Mara Option Income Strategy ETF

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+1.56%
NWG - MFG
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
WNEB - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
DB - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
HBAN - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
TFC - MFG
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+2.29%
LYG - NWG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
DB - NWG
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
MFG - NWG
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
BANC - NWG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
BLX - NWG
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
More