MFG
Price
$9.29
Change
+$0.40 (+4.50%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
114.55B
98 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NWG
Price
$18.95
Change
-$0.12 (-0.63%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
75.84B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFG vs NWG

Header iconMFG vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts MFG vs NWGBanner chart's image
Mizuho Financial Group
Price$9.29
Change+$0.40 (+4.50%)
Volume$6.03M
Capitalization114.55B
NatWest Group
Price$18.95
Change-$0.12 (-0.63%)
Volume$4.78M
Capitalization75.84B
MFG vs NWG Comparison Chart in %
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFG vs. NWG commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFG is a Buy and NWG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (MFG: $9.29 vs. NWG: $18.95)
Brand notoriety: MFG and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFG: 161% vs. NWG: 204%
Market capitalization -- MFG: $114.55B vs. NWG: $75.84B
MFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $114.55B. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $75.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • MFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MFG and NWG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFG is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

MFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.65% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFG is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.

NWG is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFG($115B) has a higher market cap than NWG($75.8B). MFG has higher P/E ratio than NWG: MFG (17.16) vs NWG (10.74). MFG YTD gains are higher at: 21.448 vs. NWG (8.971). NWG has less debt than MFG: NWG (6.14B) vs MFG (24.87T). MFG has higher revenues than NWG: MFG (3.7T) vs NWG (16.1B).
MFGNWGMFG / NWG
Capitalization115B75.8B152%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.4488.971239%
P/E Ratio17.1610.74160%
Revenue3.7T16.1B22,963%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt24.87T6.14B405,248%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFG vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
MFG
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFG's Valuation (78) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (85). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MFG (8). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to MFG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (5). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (41). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

MFG's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (22). This means that MFG’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFGNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REM22.820.25
+1.11%
iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF
PILL12.600.07
+0.56%
Direxion Daily Phrmctcl&MdclBl3XShrsETF
MGV150.250.65
+0.43%
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
BNDC22.390.01
+0.02%
FlexShares Core Select Bond ETF
TWOX28.42-0.26
-0.89%
iShares Large Cp Accelerated Outcome ETF

MFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFG has been closely correlated with SUTNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFG jumps, then SUTNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFG
1D Price
Change %
MFG100%
+0.57%
SUTNY - MFG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
DB - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
NWG - MFG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
HBAN - MFG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.85%
TFC - MFG
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+1.33%
LYG - NWG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
+0.04%
DB - NWG
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
More