MFDB
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.03 (+1.29%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.17M
SOMC
Price
$21.35
Change
+$0.35 (+1.67%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
84.27M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFDB vs SOMC

Header iconMFDB vs SOMC Comparison
Open Charts MFDB vs SOMCBanner chart's image
Mutual Federal Ban
Price$2.35
Change+$0.03 (+1.29%)
Volume$800
Capitalization5.17M
Southern Michigan Ban
Price$21.35
Change+$0.35 (+1.67%)
Volume$1.32K
Capitalization84.27M
MFDB vs SOMC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFDB vs. SOMC commentary
Jul 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFDB is a Hold and SOMC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 08, 2025
Stock price -- (MFDB: $2.35 vs. SOMC: $21.35)
Brand notoriety: MFDB and SOMC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFDB: 29% vs. SOMC: 38%
Market capitalization -- MFDB: $5.17M vs. SOMC: $84.27M
MFDB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.17M. SOMC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $84.27M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFDB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSOMC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFDB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SOMC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOMC is a better buy in the long-term than MFDB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFDB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOMC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFDB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SOMC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOMC is a better buy in the short-term than MFDB.

Price Growth

MFDB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.29% price change this week, while SOMC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOMC($84.3M) has a higher market cap than MFDB($5.17M). SOMC YTD gains are higher at: 12.729 vs. MFDB (-21.667).
MFDBSOMCMFDB / SOMC
Capitalization5.17M84.3M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.66712.729-170%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A31.2M-
Total CashN/A5.8M-
Total DebtN/A33.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFDB vs SOMC: Fundamental Ratings
MFDB
SOMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
1006
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10075
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFDB's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as SOMC (33). This means that MFDB’s stock grew similarly to SOMC’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFDB (100). This means that SOMC’s stock grew significantly faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFDB (100). This means that SOMC’s stock grew significantly faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as MFDB (62). This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

SOMC's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MFDB (100). This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFDBSOMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVU3.350.08
+2.45%
CPI Aerostructures
HBCP56.231.02
+1.85%
Home Bancorp
EWTX13.030.02
+0.15%
Edgewise Therapeutics
MCD294.08-0.55
-0.19%
McDonald's Corp
INSP128.48-2.24
-1.71%
Inspire Medical Systems

MFDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDB has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFDB jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFDB
1D Price
Change %
MFDB100%
N/A
OTPBF - MFDB
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MSVB - MFDB
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.49%
WOBK - MFDB
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FBSI - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRGG - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
More

SOMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOMC and FCAP have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOMC and FCAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOMC
1D Price
Change %
SOMC100%
N/A
FCAP - SOMC
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
PVBC - SOMC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
MFDB - SOMC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - SOMC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGBLY - SOMC
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More