MFDB
Price
$2.31
Change
-$0.04 (-1.70%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.7M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MNAT
Price
$32.66
Change
+$0.08 (+0.25%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
143.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFDB vs MNAT

Header iconMFDB vs MNAT Comparison
Open Charts MFDB vs MNATBanner chart's image
Mutual Federal Ban
Price$2.31
Change-$0.04 (-1.70%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization7.7M
Marquette National
Price$32.66
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
Volume$204
Capitalization143.28M
MFDB vs MNAT Comparison Chart in %
MFDB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFDB vs. MNAT commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFDB is a Hold and MNAT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (MFDB: $2.31 vs. MNAT: $32.66)
Brand notoriety: MFDB and MNAT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFDB: 68% vs. MNAT: 21%
Market capitalization -- MFDB: $7.7M vs. MNAT: $143.28M
MFDB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.7M. MNAT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $143.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFDB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFDB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNAT is a better buy in the long-term than MFDB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFDB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNAT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFDB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MNAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFDB is a better buy in the short-term than MNAT.

Price Growth

MFDB (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MNAT (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNAT($143M) has a higher market cap than MFDB($7.7M). MNAT YTD gains are higher at: 19.211 vs. MFDB (-23.000). MFDB has less debt than MNAT: MFDB (5M) vs MNAT (112M). MNAT has higher revenues than MFDB: MNAT (84.2M) vs MFDB (6.69M).
MFDBMNATMFDB / MNAT
Capitalization7.7M143M5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-23.00019.211-120%
P/E RatioN/A7.91-
Revenue6.69M84.2M8%
Total CashN/A35.1M-
Total Debt5M112M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFDB vs MNAT: Fundamental Ratings
MFDB
MNAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
533
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
9052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFDB's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MNAT (15). This means that MFDB’s stock grew similarly to MNAT’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFDB (100). This means that MNAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFDB (90). This means that MNAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as MFDB (63). This means that MNAT’s stock grew similarly to MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

MNAT's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFDB (100). This means that MNAT’s stock grew significantly faster than MFDB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFDBMNAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFDB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MNAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZURVY36.910.43
+1.18%
Zurich Insurance Group Ltd
RUSMF30.29N/A
N/A
Russel Metals Inc.
CRZY29.01N/A
N/A
Crazy Woman Creek Bancorp Inc.
LDXHF0.19N/A
N/A
LUMOS DIAGNOSTICS HLDGS LTD
YASKY63.87-0.56
-0.86%
Yaskawa Electric Corp.

MFDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFDB has been loosely correlated with AMFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFDB jumps, then AMFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFDB
1D Price
Change %
MFDB100%
N/A
AMFC - MFDB
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
FBSI - MFDB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVBT - MFDB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTFI - MFDB
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
FSUN - MFDB
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More

MNAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MNAT and BSPA have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MNAT and BSPA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNAT
1D Price
Change %
MNAT100%
+0.23%
BSPA - MNAT
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCLB - MNAT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNMB - MNAT
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFDB - MNAT
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFBP - MNAT
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More