MFCSF
Price
$10.63
Change
+$0.19 (+1.82%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
199.76M
65 days until earnings call
RAFLF
Price
$0.80
Change
-$0.03 (-3.61%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFCSF vs RAFLF

Header iconMFCSF vs RAFLF Comparison
Open Charts MFCSF vs RAFLFBanner chart's image
Medical Facilities
Price$10.63
Change+$0.19 (+1.82%)
Volume$310
Capitalization199.76M
Raffles Medical Group
Price$0.80
Change-$0.03 (-3.61%)
Volume$16.38K
Capitalization1.45B
MFCSF vs RAFLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFCSF vs. RAFLF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCSF is a Hold and RAFLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (MFCSF: $10.63 vs. RAFLF: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: MFCSF and RAFLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFCSF: 10% vs. RAFLF: 279%
Market capitalization -- MFCSF: $196.95M vs. RAFLF: $1.45B
MFCSF [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $196.95M. RAFLF’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $1.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $95.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFCSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRAFLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RAFLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the long-term than RAFLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFCSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RAFLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RAFLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the short-term than RAFLF.

Price Growth

MFCSF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while RAFLF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (-0.48% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RAFLF($1.45B) has a higher market cap than MFCSF($200M). RAFLF has higher P/E ratio than MFCSF: RAFLF (29.98) vs MFCSF (5.72). RAFLF YTD gains are higher at: 19.922 vs. MFCSF (-1.181). RAFLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 137M vs. MFCSF (81.5M). RAFLF has more cash in the bank: 334M vs. MFCSF (49M). MFCSF has less debt than RAFLF: MFCSF (67.6M) vs RAFLF (83.8M). RAFLF has higher revenues than MFCSF: RAFLF (764M) vs MFCSF (330M).
MFCSFRAFLFMFCSF / RAFLF
Capitalization200M1.45B14%
EBITDA81.5M137M59%
Gain YTD-1.18119.922-6%
P/E Ratio5.7229.9819%
Revenue330M764M43%
Total Cash49M334M15%
Total Debt67.6M83.8M81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFCSF vs RAFLF: Fundamental Ratings
MFCSF
RAFLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2281
SMR RATING
1..100
1379
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFCSF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as RAFLF (15). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to RAFLF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RAFLF (81). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RAFLF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RAFLF (79). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than RAFLF’s over the last 12 months.

RAFLF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (62). This means that RAFLF’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

RAFLF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFCSF (98). This means that RAFLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFCSFRAFLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RAFLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCIZX7.610.01
+0.13%
Virtus SGA International Growth R6
JANEX149.32-0.26
-0.17%
Janus Henderson Enterprise D
AAUTX31.95-0.06
-0.19%
Thrivent Large Cap Value A
WBSRX35.82-0.17
-0.47%
William Blair Small Cap Growth R6
GIUIX38.81-0.23
-0.59%
NAA Mid Growth Institutional

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
+1.83%
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
HLYK - MFCSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.51%
ORPEF - MFCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - MFCSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RAFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RAFLF and HLYK have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RAFLF and HLYK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RAFLF
1D Price
Change %
RAFLF100%
N/A
HLYK - RAFLF
17%
Poorly correlated
+7.51%
LTGHY - RAFLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KJFI - RAFLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORPEF - RAFLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWKHY - RAFLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More