Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCIX vs NAESX
MFCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCIX vs NAESX
Meridian Contrarian Investor
Price$41.59
Change-$0.28 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets584.66M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
MFCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCIX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. MFCIX (585M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCIX: NAESX (1.25) vs MFCIX (0.39). MFCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCIX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCIX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MFCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCIX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). MFCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. NAESX (9.15). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 57.53 vs. MFCIX (25.22).
| MFCIX | NAESX | MFCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.17 | 712% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.17 | 712% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.852 | 2.494 | 395% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 585M | 154B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.25 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.42 | 9.15 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.93 | 20.39 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.22 | 57.53 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.15 | 112.59 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers