Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCIX vs NAESX
MFCIX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCIX vs NAESX
Meridian Contrarian Investor
Price$42.50
Change+$0.11 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets597.04M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
MFCIX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCIX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCIX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. MFCIX (597M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCIX: NAESX (1.28) vs MFCIX (0.40). MFCIX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCIX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCIX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MFCIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCIX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). MFCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.28 vs. NAESX (8.46). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. MFCIX (36.20).
| MFCIX | NAESX | MFCIX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.17 | 712% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.17 | 712% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.256 | 2.781 | 441% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 597M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.28 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.28 | 8.46 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.09 | 34.15 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.20 | 66.66 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.21 | 114.71 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement