Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCCX vs NAESX
MFCCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCCX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
MFCCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCCX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MFCCX (552M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCCX: NAESX (1.35) vs MFCCX (0.00). MFCCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCCX (10 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MFCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCCX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). MFCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. NAESX (5.19). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 63.19 vs. MFCCX (19.70).
| MFCCX | NAESX | MFCCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.17 | 1,324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.17 | 1,324% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.485 | -4.390 | -57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 552M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.51 | 5.19 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.94 | 31.28 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.70 | 63.19 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement