Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCAX vs NAESX
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCAX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.91
Change-$2.72 (-2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.58B
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCAX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. MFCAX (606M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCAX: NAESX (1.22) vs MFCAX (0.20). MFCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCAX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MFCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCAX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). MFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. NAESX (1.42). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. MFCAX (17.46).
| MFCAX | NAESX | MFCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.608 | 6.726 | 247% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 606M | 162B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.22 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.91 | 1.42 | 696% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.14 | 33.14 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.46 | 48.22 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.06 | 137.58 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement