Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCAX vs NAESX
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCAX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$116.62
Change+$0.82 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCAX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. MFCAX (586M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCAX: NAESX (1.28) vs MFCAX (0.22). MFCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCAX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MFCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCAX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). MFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.83 vs. NAESX (12.22). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 69.32 vs. MFCAX (34.18).
| MFCAX | NAESX | MFCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.665 | 1.432 | 675% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 586M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.28 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.83 | 12.22 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.20 | 37.83 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.18 | 69.32 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.41 | 108.83 | 4% |