Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFCAX vs NAESX
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts MFCAX vs NAESX
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$118.17
Change+$0.72 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.28B
MFCAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFCAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFCAX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. MFCAX (597M). NAESX pays higher dividends than MFCAX: NAESX (1.28) vs MFCAX (0.22). MFCAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: MFCAX (12 years) vs NAESX (65 years). MFCAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). MFCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). MFCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: MFCAX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). MFCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.84 vs. NAESX (8.46). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.66 vs. MFCAX (33.27).
| MFCAX | NAESX | MFCAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.17 | 853% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.115 | 2.781 | 436% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 597M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.28 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.84 | 8.46 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.58 | 34.15 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.27 | 66.66 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.56 | 114.71 | 7% |