MFC
Price
$31.18
Change
-$0.96 (-2.99%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
44.61B
52 days until earnings call
PNGAY
Price
$12.20
Change
-$0.27 (-2.17%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
133.31B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFC vs PNGAY

Header iconMFC vs PNGAY Comparison
Open Charts MFC vs PNGAYBanner chart's image
Manulife Financial
Price$31.18
Change-$0.96 (-2.99%)
Volume$2.77M
Capitalization44.61B
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China
Price$12.20
Change-$0.27 (-2.17%)
Volume$185.16K
Capitalization133.31B
MFC vs PNGAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNGAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFC vs. PNGAY commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFC is a Buy and PNGAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (MFC: $31.18 vs. PNGAY: $12.20)
Brand notoriety: MFC and PNGAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFC: 122% vs. PNGAY: 89%
Market capitalization -- MFC: $44.61B vs. PNGAY: $133.31B
MFC [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $44.61B. PNGAY’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $133.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNGAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNGAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both MFC and PNGAY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNGAY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNGAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNGAY is a better buy in the short-term than MFC.

Price Growth

MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -3.88% price change this week, while PNGAY (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

PNGAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.92% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNGAY($133B) has a higher market cap than MFC($44.6B). MFC has higher P/E ratio than PNGAY: MFC (12.74) vs PNGAY (9.16). PNGAY YTD gains are higher at: 8.711 vs. MFC (1.530). PNGAY has higher revenues than MFC: PNGAY (1.04T) vs MFC (42.3B).
MFCPNGAYMFC / PNGAY
Capitalization44.6B133B34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.5308.71118%
P/E Ratio12.749.16139%
Revenue42.3B1.04T4%
Total Cash20.3BN/A-
Total Debt12.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFC vs PNGAY: Fundamental Ratings
MFC
PNGAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9100
SMR RATING
1..100
1001
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PNGAY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as MFC (34) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PNGAY’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for PNGAY (100) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew significantly faster than PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.

PNGAY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFC (100) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PNGAY’s stock grew significantly faster than MFC’s over the last 12 months.

PNGAY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as MFC (51) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PNGAY’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PNGAY (58) in the null industry. This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to PNGAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFCPNGAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNGAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLARX8.17-0.06
-0.73%
NYLI CBRE Real Estate Class A
TTMIX164.14-1.59
-0.96%
T. Rowe Price Comm & Tech I
PIGWX15.91-0.22
-1.36%
Putnam International Value R6
JECTX16.99-0.24
-1.39%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq C
UGLSX75.04-1.22
-1.60%
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth R6

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
-2.99%
MET - MFC
72%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
PRU - MFC
70%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
UNM - MFC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
LNC - MFC
66%
Closely correlated
-1.99%
BHF - MFC
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
More

PNGAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNGAY has been closely correlated with AAGIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNGAY jumps, then AAGIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNGAY
1D Price
Change %
PNGAY100%
-2.17%
AAGIY - PNGAY
73%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
PUK - PNGAY
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.44%
AAIGF - PNGAY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CILJF - PNGAY
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
MFC - PNGAY
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
More