MFBP
Price
$19.77
Change
+$0.76 (+4.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
6.09M
PGC
Price
$26.40
Change
+$0.52 (+2.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
428.6M
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFBP vs PGC

Header iconMFBP vs PGC Comparison
Open Charts MFBP vs PGCBanner chart's image
M&F Ban
Price$19.77
Change+$0.76 (+4.00%)
Volume$1.11K
Capitalization6.09M
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
Price$26.40
Change+$0.52 (+2.01%)
Volume$124.02K
Capitalization428.6M
MFBP vs PGC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MFBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFBP vs. PGC commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFBP is a Hold and PGC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (MFBP: $19.77 vs. PGC: $26.40)
Brand notoriety: MFBP and PGC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFBP: 129% vs. PGC: 135%
Market capitalization -- MFBP: $6.09M vs. PGC: $428.6M
MFBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.09M. PGC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $428.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MFBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFBP is a better buy in the long-term than PGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFBP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PGC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFBP is a better buy in the short-term than PGC.

Price Growth

MFBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.96% price change this week, while PGC (@Regional Banks) price change was -11.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

PGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGC($429M) has a higher market cap than MFBP($6.09M). MFBP YTD gains are higher at: 2.116 vs. PGC (-17.358). MFBP has less debt than PGC: MFBP (864K) vs PGC (553M). PGC has higher revenues than MFBP: PGC (226M) vs MFBP (11.5M).
MFBPPGCMFBP / PGC
Capitalization6.09M429M1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.116-17.358-12%
P/E RatioN/A8.96-
Revenue11.5M226M5%
Total CashN/A7.4M-
Total Debt864K553M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFBP vs PGC: Fundamental Ratings
MFBP
PGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4567
SMR RATING
1..100
5226
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1959
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PGC's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFBP (69) in the null industry. This means that PGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFBP’s over the last 12 months.

MFBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as PGC (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFBP’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

PGC's SMR Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MFBP (52) in the null industry. This means that PGC’s stock grew similarly to MFBP’s over the last 12 months.

MFBP's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as PGC (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFBP’s stock grew similarly to PGC’s over the last 12 months.

MFBP's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PGC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MFBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFBPPGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHELF0.02N/A
+12.86%
FIRST HELIUM INC
LVMHF579.0524.37
+4.39%
LVMH-Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton
CHOLF0.80N/A
N/A
China Oilfield Services Ltd.
FNRN10.55N/A
N/A
First Northern Community Bancorp
NUVSF10.37-0.04
-0.38%
NuVista Energy Ltd.

MFBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFBP and HOMB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFBP and HOMB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFBP
1D Price
Change %
MFBP100%
N/A
HOMB - MFBP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
QCRH - MFBP
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
PGC - MFBP
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
THFF - MFBP
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
SMBK - MFBP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More

PGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PGC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGC
1D Price
Change %
PGC100%
+2.01%
UBSI - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
HBNC - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
BHB - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
PEBO - PGC
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
AROW - PGC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
More