Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs REMIX
MFADX vs REMIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. REMIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and REMIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REMIX has more cash in the bank: 746M vs. MFADX (91.1M). REMIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: REMIX (0.45) vs MFADX (0.02). MFADX was incepted earlier than REMIX: MFADX (13 years) vs REMIX (6 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than REMIX (1.64). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. REMIX (11.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than REMIX: MFADX (2000) vs REMIX (2500). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.90 vs. REMIX (6.39). REMIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.06 vs. MFADX (35.14).
| MFADX | REMIX | MFADX / REMIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.51 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.64 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.397 | 3.596 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.1M | 746M | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.45 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.90 | 6.39 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.44 | 20.51 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.14 | 44.06 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement