Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs QLENX
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs QLENX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$26.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.07M
MFADX vs QLENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. QLENX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a StrongBuy and QLENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLENX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. MFADX (91.1M). QLENX pays higher dividends than MFADX: QLENX (5.56) vs MFADX (0.81). MFADX was incepted earlier than QLENX: MFADX (13 years) vs QLENX (12 years). QLENX (5.59) is less costly to investors than MFADX (2.34). QLENX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 362.00 vs. MFADX (108.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than QLENX: MFADX (2000) vs QLENX (2500). QLENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.27 vs. MFADX (13.23). QLENX return over 5 years is better than : 203.76 vs. MFADX (42.07).
| MFADX | QLENX | MFADX / QLENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 5.58 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 5.59 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.405 | 28.480 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.1M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 5.56 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.23 | 30.27 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.47 | 106.83 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 203.76 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.92 | 145.40 | 57% |