Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs NLSIX
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$26.86
Change+$0.97 (+3.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.12M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$19.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. NLSIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. MFADX (91.1M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: NLSIX (0.05) vs MFADX (0.02). MFADX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFADX (13 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (0.96). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFADX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.90 vs. NLSIX (3.79). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 35.14 vs. NLSIX (21.63).
| MFADX | NLSIX | MFADX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.32 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.32 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.397 | -0.597 | -234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.1M | 8.16B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.05 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.90 | 3.79 | 419% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.44 | 26.67 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.14 | 21.63 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.81 | 71.37 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement