Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs NLSIX
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$26.62
Change-$0.16 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.34M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.06
Change-$0.09 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. NLSIX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. MFADX (90.3M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than MFADX: NLSIX (0.05) vs MFADX (0.03). MFADX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFADX (13 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFADX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.63 vs. NLSIX (7.46). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 33.63 vs. NLSIX (24.29).
| MFADX | NLSIX | MFADX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.32 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.32 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.095 | 0.299 | 367% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.3M | 7.99B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.05 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.63 | 7.46 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.20 | 28.29 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.63 | 24.29 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.88 | 72.34 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement