Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs NLSIX
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs NLSIX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$25.76
Change+$0.17 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.99M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
MFADX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. NLSIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.82B vs. MFADX (89M). MFADX pays higher dividends than NLSIX: MFADX (0.83) vs NLSIX (0.02). MFADX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: MFADX (13 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). MFADX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: MFADX (2000) vs NLSIX (1000000). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. NLSIX (8.02). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 42.04 vs. NLSIX (23.45).
| MFADX | NLSIX | MFADX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.32 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.32 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.083 | 6.667 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89M | 7.82B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 0.02 | 4,030% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.75 | 8.02 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.38 | 24.74 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.04 | 23.45 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.58 | 59.69 | 132% |