Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
MFADX vs NLSAX
MFADX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts MFADX vs NLSAX
Cromwell Long Short Investor
Price$26.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets91.07M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
MFADX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
MFADX vs. NLSAX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFADX is a StrongBuy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. MFADX (91.1M). MFADX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: MFADX (0.81) vs NLSAX (0.00). MFADX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: MFADX (13 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). MFADX (2.34) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). MFADX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. NLSAX (48.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MFADX: NLSAX (1000) vs MFADX (2000). MFADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. NLSAX (6.74). MFADX return over 5 years is better than : 41.82 vs. NLSAX (19.78).
| MFADX | NLSAX | MFADX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.16 | 1.68 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.34 | 1.68 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.803 | 7.259 | 245% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.1M | 8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.47 | 6.74 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.88 | 19.70 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.82 | 19.78 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.54 | 56.79 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement