MEXGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.49M
USHAF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.07M
Interact to see
Advertisement

MEXGF vs USHAF

Header iconMEXGF vs USHAF Comparison
Open Charts MEXGF vs USHAFBanner chart's image
MEXICAN GOLD MNG
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$14K
Capitalization1.49M
USHA RES
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.31K
Capitalization6.07M
MEXGF vs USHAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MEXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MEXGF vs. USHAF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MEXGF is a Hold and USHAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (MEXGF: $0.04 vs. USHAF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: MEXGF and USHAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MEXGF: 134% vs. USHAF: 53%
Market capitalization -- MEXGF: $1.49M vs. USHAF: $6.07M
MEXGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.49M. USHAF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $6.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MEXGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSHAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MEXGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USHAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USHAF is a better buy in the long-term than MEXGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MEXGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USHAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MEXGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • USHAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MEXGF is a better buy in the short-term than USHAF.

Price Growth

MEXGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -33.25% price change this week, while USHAF (@Precious Metals) price change was -31.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USHAF($6.07M) has a higher market cap than MEXGF($1.49M). MEXGF YTD gains are higher at: 41.450 vs. USHAF (-39.718). MEXGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -439.09K vs. USHAF (-2.34M). USHAF has more cash in the bank: 1.02M vs. MEXGF (44.1K). MEXGF (0) and USHAF (0) have equivalent revenues.
MEXGFUSHAFMEXGF / USHAF
Capitalization1.49M6.07M25%
EBITDA-439.09K-2.34M19%
Gain YTD41.450-39.718-104%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash44.1K1.02M4%
Total Debt450KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MEXGF: Fundamental Ratings
MEXGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MEXGFUSHAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MEXGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USHAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYTM62.731.28
+2.09%
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals
KR71.420.14
+0.20%
Kroger Co (The)
GHLD19.73N/A
N/A
Guild Holdings Company
RCON2.68-0.01
-0.37%
Recon Technology Ltd.
ASPI7.40-0.39
-5.01%
ASP Isotopes

MEXGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEXGF has been loosely correlated with CRTIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEXGF jumps, then CRTIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEXGF
1D Price
Change %
MEXGF100%
-23.90%
CRTIF - MEXGF
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.41%
PMDRF - MEXGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLGDF - MEXGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.00%
CJIMF - MEXGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYAGF - MEXGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
More

USHAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USHAF and CJIMF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USHAF and CJIMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USHAF
1D Price
Change %
USHAF100%
-10.46%
CJIMF - USHAF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOOYF - USHAF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
MEXGF - USHAF
22%
Poorly correlated
-23.90%
TRX - USHAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
SILS - USHAF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
More