METOF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
241.12M
MMILF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
326.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

METOF vs MMILF

Header iconMETOF vs MMILF Comparison
Open Charts METOF vs MMILFBanner chart's image
Meteoric Resorces NL
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$1.74M
Capitalization241.12M
Metro Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$10.5K
Capitalization326.11M
METOF vs MMILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
METOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
METOF vs. MMILF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is METOF is a Hold and MMILF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (METOF: $0.10 vs. MMILF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: METOF and MMILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: METOF: 118% vs. MMILF: 29%
Market capitalization -- METOF: $241.12M vs. MMILF: $326.11M
METOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $241.12M. MMILF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $326.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

METOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMILF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • METOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMILF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMILF is a better buy in the long-term than METOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

METOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMILF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • METOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMILF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMILF is a better buy in the short-term than METOF.

Price Growth

METOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while MMILF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.43% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMILF($326M) has a higher market cap than METOF($241M). MMILF YTD gains are higher at: 85.348 vs. METOF (64.068). MMILF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.5M vs. METOF (-42.29M).
METOFMMILFMETOF / MMILF
Capitalization241M326M74%
EBITDA-42.29M-5.5M769%
Gain YTD64.06885.34875%
P/E RatioN/A3.39-
RevenueN/A389M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METOFMMILF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
14%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
METOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADNCX19.190.11
+0.58%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov C
BMRRX34.710.09
+0.26%
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity R
EGOIX20.620.03
+0.15%
Allspring Large Cap Core Inst
RYLGX113.76-0.42
-0.37%
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth A
NRAAX52.96-0.35
-0.66%
Neuberger Berman Quality Equity A

METOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that METOF and FSUGY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that METOF and FSUGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To METOF
1D Price
Change %
METOF100%
+10.63%
FSUGY - METOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
BHPLF - METOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
NICMF - METOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DETRF - METOF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNDAF - METOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+13.18%
More

MMILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMILF and VDOMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMILF and VDOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMILF
1D Price
Change %
MMILF100%
N/A
VDOMF - MMILF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCLIF - MMILF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPAF - MMILF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
DETRF - MMILF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
METOF - MMILF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.63%
More