Advertisement
META vs QWLD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is META is a Hold and QWLD is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
META’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- META’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
META’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- META’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
META (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +1.65% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
META is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-0.36% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| META | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 51% | 9 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WIA | 8.48 | 0.01 | +0.12% |
| Western Asset Inflation-Linked Income Fund | |||
| VMAX | 52.94 | N/A | N/A |
| Hartford US Value ETF | |||
| GMNY | 49.94 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Goldman Sachs Dynamic New Yor Mun IncETF | |||
| IJR | 117.59 | -0.20 | -0.17% |
| iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | |||
| MQY | 11.53 | -0.07 | -0.60% |
| Blackrock Muni Yield Quality Fund | |||
META and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| DASH - META | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| OPRA - META | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| GOOGL - META | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| GOOG - META | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| RDDT - META | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
More | ||||
QWLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QWLD has been loosely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QWLD jumps, then V could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QWLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QWLD | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| V - QWLD | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| MSFT - QWLD | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| META - QWLD | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| AAPL - QWLD | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| NVDA - QWLD | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||