MET
Price
$79.51
Change
-$2.24 (-2.74%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.88B
53 days until earnings call
MFC
Price
$30.66
Change
-$0.25 (-0.81%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
52.31B
67 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

MET vs MFC

Header iconMET vs MFC Comparison
Open Charts MET vs MFCBanner chart's image
MetLife
Price$79.51
Change-$2.24 (-2.74%)
Volume$4.83M
Capitalization52.88B
Manulife Financial
Price$30.66
Change-$0.25 (-0.81%)
Volume$1.73M
Capitalization52.31B
MET vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MET vs. MFC commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MET is a Hold and MFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (MET: $79.51 vs. MFC: $30.66)
Brand notoriety: MET: Notable vs. MFC: Not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MET: 159% vs. MFC: 80%
Market capitalization -- MET: $52.88B vs. MFC: $52.31B
MET [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $52.88B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $52.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $139.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MET’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MET is a better buy in the long-term than MFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MET’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MET’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both MET and MFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

MET (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -2.27% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

MET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.33% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($52.9B) and MFC($52.3B) have the same market capitalization . MFC (13.64) and MET (13.50) have similar P/E ratio . MFC YTD gains are higher at: -0.163 vs. MET (-0.797). MFC has less debt than MET: MFC (13.3B) vs MET (19.9B).
METMFCMET / MFC
Capitalization52.9B52.3B101%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.797-0.163490%
P/E Ratio13.5013.6499%
RevenueN/A47.5B-
Total CashN/A23.8B-
Total Debt19.9B13.3B150%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MET vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
MET
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2416
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8968
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (28) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (40). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (24). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's SMR Rating (99) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

MET's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (56). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

MFC's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (89). This means that MFC’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
METMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAN44.042.02
+4.81%
Invesco Solar ETF
FMUB50.380.32
+0.64%
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opports ETF
ALTY11.780.06
+0.49%
Global X Alternative Income ETF
XCCC39.000.06
+0.15%
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
DFUS70.50-0.16
-0.23%
Dimensional US Equity Market ETF

MET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MET has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MET jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MET
1D Price
Change %
MET100%
-2.74%
PRU - MET
83%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
PRI - MET
81%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
CNO - MET
79%
Closely correlated
-1.66%
LNC - MET
79%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
UNM - MET
78%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
More

MFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFC has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MFC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFC
1D Price
Change %
MFC100%
-0.81%
MET - MFC
72%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
PRU - MFC
70%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
PRI - MFC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
LNC - MFC
68%
Closely correlated
-2.57%
BHF - MFC
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
More